Peter Prymmer/FactSet wrote on 12/31/2004 04:36:31 PM:
> I have not yet found how to fix the .exists into OLB
> problem nor the trouble with MMS V3.2-01 reported earlier.
I forgot to mention that *.opt files are not being cleaned
on VMS as another problem that persists.
I seem to have solved the
Peter Prymmer/FactSet wrote on 01/03/2005 10:54:24 AM:
> I'll see about restoring the cleaning of .opt files next.
OK here is a patch that implements this extra clean target file
cleanup.
--- ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6_25_07/lib/ExtUtils/MM_VMS.pm;-3Mon Jan 3 10:43:10
2005
+++ ExtUtils-MakeMaker
Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 01/01/2005 07:38:57 PM:
> My bad. I left in a / when I unified the VMS tool_xsubpp(). Its better
> solved by changing $(XSUBPPDIR)/xsbupp to $(XSUBPPDIR)$(DFSEP)xsubpp.
I can confirm that this solution would be fine for VMS since
DFSEP contains an
Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 01/01/2005 06:50:43 PM:
> I don't quite understand what 6.17 has to do with it. MakeMaker builds
> itself using itself, not the installed version.
Sorry - I did not realize that.
> > With that installed a second attempt to build it with mms 3.2-01
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 12:53:03PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Probably the directory target issue on older MMS' that Craig pointed out.
>
> Probably. My version of MMS is older than Craig's and is
> even less informative about the trouble than his was.
Do these guys charge for upgrades
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 12:49:33PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am trying to imagine what utility there is in having
> a dependence on /unix/path/to/xsubpp inside the Makefile.
> Perhaps if you were hacking on xsubpp it might be helpful, but
> even if you were doing that I'd argue that your
Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 01/03/2005 02:41:17 PM:
> Do these guys charge for upgrades or something?
They might.
Peter Prymmer
[I am only monitoring [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 12:53:03PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Probably the directory target issue on older MMS' that Craig pointed out.
Probably. My version of MMS is older than Craig's and is
even less informative about the tro
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 04:45:46PM -0500, John E. Malmberg wrote:
> >Do these guys charge for upgrades or something?
>
> For commercial use: yes. There is a developer's partner's program where
> you pay one fee and get a suite of product licenses and media.
> Otherwise it requires either a supp
[I only see replies to vmsperl@perl.org
Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 04:45:46PM -0500, John E. Malmberg wrote:
Do these guys charge for upgrades or something?
For commercial use: yes. There is a developer's partner's program where
you pay one fee and get a suite of product lic
I, for one, think it's entirely reasonable to only support MMK and the most (or
more) recent versions of MMS. I seem to recall that there are problems we've
had with very old MMS versions that were not addressed.
--Jordan Henderson
> -Original Message-
> From: John E. Malmberg [mailto:[E
11 matches
Mail list logo
