Re: Where were we at?

2005-02-07 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 05:44:20PM -0600, Craig A. Berry wrote: > That was my first theory as well, but that's not it. It's the result of > the fact that I have a logical name "bin" defined, so it looks for > bin/foo there rather than in the local relative path. Simply prepending > ./ seems to do t

Re: Where were we at?

2005-02-07 Thread John E. Malmberg
[Only subsribed to vmsperl] On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Michael G Schwern wrote: > On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 05:44:20PM -0600, Craig A. Berry wrote: > > That was my first theory as well, but that's not it. It's the result of > > the fact that I have a logical name "bin" defined, so it looks for > > bin/foo

Re: GNU make & lstat() topic

2005-02-07 Thread John E. Malmberg
On Sun, 6 Feb 2005, Craig A. Berry wrote: > At 7:30 PM -0500 2/4/05, John E. Malmberg wrote: > >Craig A. Berry wrote: > > > >>When GNV gets to the point where we can use Configure rather than > >>configure.com and stop maintaining a separate behemoth configuration > >>script, that's the point wher