[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 02/23/2005 08:10:49 PM:
[snip /]
> I am sorry to say that I cannot help much here other than to point
> out the examination of your fabdef.h header could help out, then pehaps
> introducing some sensitivity to macros like:
Yes, I was pursuing conditionalizing on __VMS_
Thomas R Wyant_III/AE/DuPont wrote on 02/24/2005 10:58:40
AM:
[snip /]
> Yes, I was pursuing conditionalizing on __VMS_VER.
For some reason
> it didn't occur to me to just
>
> #ifdef fab$v_erl
>
Well, maybe it was the second thought that was no
good here. What I fear is that fab$v_erl is pa
At 5:50 PM -0500 2/24/05, Thomas R Wyant_III wrote:
>Thomas R Wyant_III/AE/DuPont wrote on 02/24/2005 10:58:40 AM:
>
>[snip /]
>
>> Yes, I was pursuing conditionalizing on __VMS_VER. For some reason
>> it didn't occur to me to just
>>
> > #ifdef fab$v_erl
>>
>
>Well, maybe it was the second thought
At 4:41 PM -0500 2/18/05, Dave Greenwood wrote:
>Having installed PathTools into PERL_ROOT (via MMK INSTALL), is it possible
>to run the full Perl test suite on the installed (& updated) version of
>Perl?
There's nothing like that currently implemented. I think there is
the beginning of an insta
