Re: [ANNOUNCE] ExtUtils::MakeMaker 6.25_10

2005-03-14 Thread Stas Bekman
Michael G Schwern wrote: On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 08:58:18PM -0500, Stas Bekman wrote: OK, so I'll commit the following: my $pm_to_blib = ($ExtUtils::MakeMaker::VERSION >= 6.22 && $ExtUtils::MakeMaker::VERSION <= 6.25 ) ? "pm_to_blib.ts" : "pm_to_blib"; Unfortun

Re: [ANNOUNCE] ExtUtils::MakeMaker 6.25_10

2005-03-14 Thread Stas Bekman
Michael G Schwern wrote: http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/src/ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.25_10.tar.gz or http://svn.schwern.org/svn/CPAN/ExtUtils-MakeMaker/trunk or a CPAN near you Its another release candidate. This one fixes the recompilation problem noted in the last release (and various previous ones).

Re: [ANNOUNCE] ExtUtils::MakeMaker 6.25_10

2005-03-14 Thread Stas Bekman
Michael G Schwern wrote: On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 07:58:13PM -0500, Stas Bekman wrote: shouldn't http://svn.schwern.org/svn/CPAN/ExtUtils-MakeMaker/trunk/Changes show changes since _09? it shows _09 only. ALLAKAZAM! It is done (forgot to push the changes off my local repo). Thanks. why pm_to_blib.

Re: [ANNOUNCE] ExtUtils::MakeMaker 6.25_10

2005-03-14 Thread Stas Bekman
Michael G Schwern wrote: On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 08:25:00PM -0500, Stas Bekman wrote: why pm_to_blib.ts has now disappeared? mod_perl2 already had: I couldn't make it work. It was easier to just revert back to what 6.21 did, this caused less modules to break. See: http://www.nntp.perl.org/grou

Re: Module::Install and portability?

2005-03-14 Thread Thomas R Wyant_III
Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 03/13/2005 06:34:27 PM: > As mentioned here, I want to break up MakeMaker. > http://www.makemaker.org/wiki/index.cgi?ModulesForSale > > There's a number of modules which are just utilities MakeMaker uses and I > want them out in their own distributi

Re: Module::Install and portability?

2005-03-14 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 08:46:12AM -0500, Thomas R Wyant_III wrote: > I didn't have any luck with Module::Install under OpenVMS/AXP 7.1-1. It > does a fair amount of direct manipulation of @INC in ordinary > circumstances, and even more on the install, because it tries to bootstrap > itself from

Re: Module::Install and portability?

2005-03-14 Thread Craig Berry
On Monday, March 14, 2005, at 12:10PM, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 08:46:12AM -0500, Thomas R Wyant_III wrote: >> I didn't have any luck with Module::Install under OpenVMS/AXP 7.1-1. It >> does a fair amount of direct manipulation of @INC in ordinary

Re: ExtUtils::CBuilder on VMS (was Re: Phalanxing MakeMaker)

2005-03-14 Thread PPrymmer
Ken Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 03/12/2005 10:35:22 PM: > On Mar 12, 2005, at 7:18 PM, Ken Williams wrote: > > > > Excellent. I just have one question, then, about the following line: > > > > my @lddlflags = $args{lddl} ? ($cf->{lddlflags}."=$out") : > > ("/exe=$out"); > > > > What is

Re: ExtUtils::CBuilder on VMS (was Re: Phalanxing MakeMaker)

2005-03-14 Thread Ken Williams
On Mar 14, 2005, at 1:30 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK that one is much close to what I thought you were aiming at :-) It turns out there was an override typo in VMS.pm and t/02-link.t was left as is. Oops! That was me forgetting to apply the 02-link.t part of the patch. This time around I have

Re: ExtUtils::CBuilder on VMS (was Re: Phalanxing MakeMaker)

2005-03-14 Thread PPrymmer
Ken Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 03/14/2005 04:23:10 PM: > Thanks, applied verbatim (except that I moved the system() call into a > my_system() subroutine in case I want to use it again later). Hmm - well I suppose I should mention a few tricky aspects of using MCR on VMS. Perhaps most