On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, John E. Malmberg wrote:
> Craig A. Berry wrote:
>
> > I believe what he's done is taken Perl 5.8.6, merged PathTools 3.05
> > into it and run the core test suite. The before and after results
> > he's showing are the core test suite results before and after
> > upgrading Path
At 5:39 PM -0800 3/16/05, Michael G Schwern wrote:
>On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 07:27:06PM -0600, Craig A. Berry wrote:
>> # timestamp file to avoid repeated invocations under VMS
>> pm_to_blib : pm_to_blib.ts
>> $(NOECHO) $(NOOP)
>>
>>
>> pm_to_blib : $(TO_INST_PM)
>
>There's the trouble. Try th
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 10:37:11AM -0600, John E. Malmberg wrote:
> > The is_deeply test when I run it by it self is passing all 22 tests,
> > however one test is generating some text explaining that it succeeded.
> > That explanation is not being preceded by "#" characters like I have
> > noticed
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 11:44:11AM -0600, Craig A. Berry wrote:
> After that, you need what's below (a space before the $(TOUCH)) so
> the $(TOUCH) doesn't get put right next to the $(NOECHO) that
> precedes it. After that, all tests pass, though the xs test skips
> because it incorrectly thinks t
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 10:37:11AM -0600, John E. Malmberg wrote:
> > > The is_deeply test when I run it by it self is passing all 22 tests,
> > > however one test is generating some text explaining that it succeeded.
> > > That explanation is not
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 01:45:31PM -0600, John E. Malmberg wrote:
> > This is a warning which is supposed to be trapped by is_deeply.t so it can
> > be tested. It has nothing to do with PathTools.
> >
> > Furthermore, that warning was added in Test::More 0.48_02. 5.8.6 shipped
> > with 0.47. The
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 01:45:31PM -0600, John E. Malmberg wrote:
>
> You'll notice that was in PathTool's [.t.lib] directory which does NOT
> normally get installed. It is there so that PathTools users do not have
> to upgrade or even install Test:
Thomas R Wyant_III wrote:
Has anyone gotten Module::Install to work under VMS? Or has anyone _not_
been able to get it to install?
Install, heck, I can't even get it to build:
$ perl Makefile.PL
Can't locate object method "new" via package
"Module::Install::autoinstall" (perhaps you forgot to loa
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 03:07:15PM -0600, Craig A. Berry wrote:
> >Has anyone gotten Module::Install to work under VMS? Or has anyone _not_
> >been able to get it to install?
>
> Install, heck, I can't even get it to build:
>
> $ perl Makefile.PL
> Can't locate object method "new" via package
>
