Re: [PATCH] sync blead with File-Path 2.00_11

2007-09-10 Thread Craig A. Berry
On 9/10/07, David Landgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Craig A. Berry wrote: > > On 9/8/07, Rafael Garcia-Suarez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On 08/09/2007, David Landgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> The following patch to Path.pm and Path.t allows blead's test suite to > >>> run without e

Re: [PATCH] sync blead with File-Path 2.00_11

2007-09-10 Thread John E. Malmberg
Craig A. Berry wrote: On 9/10/07, David Landgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Craig A. Berry wrote: On 9/8/07, Rafael Garcia-Suarez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 08/09/2007, David Landgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The following patch to Path.pm and Path.t allows blead's test suite to run

Re: Archive::Extract 0.24 wannabe

2007-09-10 Thread John E. Malmberg
Jos I. Boumans wrote: Hi Guys, On Aug 24, 2007, at 5:55 PM, Craig A. Berry wrote: Good catch. It should of course be C<=~> rather than C<=>. Somehow I've managed to be both slow and hasty in my patch review and application lately. I will fix this and the bizarre use of whitespace while I'm

Re: Module::Load 0.12 wanna be (was Re: [patch@31735] Module-load/require fixes for VMS)

2007-09-10 Thread John E. Malmberg
Jos I. Boumans wrote: On Aug 25, 2007, at 5:11 AM, John E. Malmberg wrote: So are you saying I should roll back #31746: http://public.activestate.com/cgi-bin/perlbrowse/p/31746 and apply Jos's patch instead? No. Joe's patch works around the issue for all versions of Perl only for the CPAN

Re: [PATCH] sync blead with File-Path 2.00_11

2007-09-10 Thread John E. Malmberg
John E. Malmberg wrote: Craig A. Berry wrote: On 9/10/07, David Landgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Craig A. Berry wrote: On 9/8/07, Rafael Garcia-Suarez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 08/09/2007, David Landgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The following patch to Path.pm and Path.t allows b

Re: Module::Load::Conditional 0.18 wannabe

2007-09-10 Thread John E. Malmberg
Jos I. Boumans wrote: Hi Guys, Attached is a development release of M::L::Conditional. It depends on the new version of Module::Load i mailed around earlier today. Using that, there shouldn't be any more need for the VMS specific quirks in the test > suite, and they should pass cleanly.