Re: Need a small VMS test

2008-09-30 Thread Hein, Nashua NH
On Sep 30, 1:24 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John E. Malmberg) wrote: > Michael G Schwern wrote: > > Hi, I need a quick VMS test for the new code to detect the range of time_t. > VMS keeps time internally as a 64 bit signed integer all platforms, > usually in local time.  The base time is November 17, 1

Re: Need a small VMS test

2008-09-30 Thread Craig A. Berry
On Sep 30, 2008, at 6:22 AM, Hein, Nashua NH wrote: On Sep 30, 1:24 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John E. Malmberg) wrote: Michael G Schwern wrote: Hi, I need a quick VMS test for the new code to detect the range of time_t. VMS keeps time internally as a 64 bit signed integer all platforms, usua

Re: Need a small VMS test

2008-09-30 Thread Michael G Schwern
John E. Malmberg wrote: > Default: > > EAGLE> run time_t_test > gmtime max 4294967295 > gmtime min 0 >localtime max 4294967295 >localtime min 0 > > EAGLE> CC time_t_test.c/define=__SIGNED_INT_TIME_T > EAGLE> link time_t_test > EAGLE> run time_t_test >

Re: Need a small VMS test

2008-09-30 Thread John E. Malmberg
Michael G Schwern wrote: John E. Malmberg wrote: Default: Thanks, that looks all correct. If you could try the latest version of the code that would be great. It makes it more accurate for systems which have silly failure points, like Y10K. http://code.google.com/p/y2038/source/browse/trunk/