Craig A. Berry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:wrote:
: I think it would set a bad precedent to have a core module ignoring
: changes affecting @INC.
:
:It would only ignore run-time changes to @INC or run-time changes to
:the current working directory
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Craig Berry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:OK, what's happening is the utility generator scripts are doing the
:equivalent of
:
:use Config;
:chdir 'somewhere_else';
:$x = $Config{flirble};
:
:The fetch of 'flirble' fails because it's
Note: I think I only get mail on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list.
Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 01:58:52PM -0600, Craig Berry wrote:
I'm not sure. I was trying to keep Config's AUTOLOAD as simple as possible.
Then again, using %INC shouldn't be that hard.
For the Unix Makefile I hit
At 9:57 PM + 11/27/04, Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2004 at 03:31:17PM -0600, Craig A. Berry wrote:
\ The editing looks fine. It appears that we also need the attached patch
to get Config_heavy.pl put in the right place at the right time.
Oops. I missed one then. Sorry about that,
