Hi Carlos,
you're right, I scrambled the expression for G, things are indeed the way you
describe them. The bounded reciprocal would work with any > 0 epsilon added
to the | grad I |, so 1 is as good as others.
For citing the pipeline you can use
Antiga L, Piccinelli M, Botti L, Ene-Iordache B,
Hi Luca,
Thanks for your replay, it has been very helpful.
Never the less it is note clear to me, yet, the current implementations of
G and P functions, you explained:
"In the current implementation, G is the bounded inverse of the intensity
gradient magnitude (1 / (epsilon + del G)).
P is the vec
Hi Carlos,
On Dec 3, 2012, at 3:12 PM, Carlos Alberto Bulant wrote:
> Hello Luca,
> thanks for the answers, i would like to do more questions related to the
> subject.
>
> i would like to summarize (in the form of pseudo-code) how i understand the
> level set segmentation works, and then ask y
Hello Luca,
thanks for the answers, i would like to do more questions related to the
subject.
i would like to summarize (in the form of pseudo-code) how i understand the
level set segmentation works, and then ask you some questions
// pseudo-code
begin-
Hello Carlos,
welcome to vmtk and sorry for the wait. I hope the timing won't stop you from
sending more questions in the future.
The level set code I used during my PhD was written by me, then ITK came along
and I was very happy to fully embrace it :-)
So right now level set implementation in
Hi VMTK users,
this is my first post in this mailing list (probably there will be more),
i'm a new user just starting to use the toolkit.
Now to my questions:
When using the level set segmentation filter in the form of :
vmtklevelsetsegmentation -ifile image_volume_voi.vti -ofile level_sets.vti
