Ron,
At the present time, only VNC Enterprise Edition supports remoting of
individual displays in multi-monitor systems, via addition of a REG_SZ
DisplayDevice registry entry, set to the device name to remote e.g.
\\.\DISPLAY1.
Regards,
Wez @ RealVNC Ltd.
-Original Message-
From:
Vdiesl,
Not sure I understand what u mean.
On both computers I have :
Accept connections on port : 5955
Serve Java viewer via HTTP on port : 5855.
I tried again to use vncviewer from icon Run vncviewer or
from explorer http://192.168.0.1:; (is there a
difference ?) and in the
Huey,
The most likely cause of this problem is that you have misconfigured the PPP
connection at the first XP machine to be tagged as an Internet connection,
so that the first XP machine tries to use it for all Internet traffic
(including the VNC traffic back to the 2K machine) and so sends it to
What are you typing in to Internet Explorer to try to get to the applet
page? Is it accessible locally, from the machine running the server?
Wez @ RealVNC Ltd.
-Original Message-
Thanks for you quick response!
Well, Port 5800 can't be blocked. In my Router Port 5800 is
Angelo,
That's upside-down thinking, in that if UPnP is present then the security
risk is there - not using it to make it easier to use a particular program
simply means that user's gain no benefit from it, even though they still
have the extra risk!
Cheers,
Wez @ RealVNC Ltd.
-Original
Connection refused means that there is nothing listening on the specified
network port on the server machine.
Are you sure you are specifying the correct display number to VNC Viewer?
Wez @ RealVNC Ltd.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Heyaz. I released version 0.99d of Kaboodle today.
As some might recall...when you use Kaboodle to connect two
networks together using KaboodleProxy, you can VNC and
file-transfer across a firewall/router without either side
having to do any port-forwarding adjustments. No really. :)
Lennard,
Filtering based on host name is tricky, because the efficient way to do it
involves a reverse-DNS lookup on the IP address of the incoming connection.
With dynamic DNS services, though, this won't actually resolve to the
correct name, so it won't work.
The other key point to remember is
That's what I'm typing in: http://computer-IP:5900
Yes, I've also tried it within my local network by using the internal IP of
that pc. The error stays the same (RFB 003.008).
I think within my local network, no port has to be activated, or?
But the message RFB 003.008 will displayed, too...
I
Chris,
Your problem is that you are using http://computer-ip:5900
Which causes your browser to try to do HTTP to the VNC port of your server.
You need instead to use http://computer-ip:5800
Which will point your browser at the HTTP port of the VNC Server.
Regards,
Wez @ RealVNC Ltd.
Wez:
Heya. Yes: with no ports enabled/forwarded, two Kaboodle
users can VNC and file-transfer with each other.
As for what it implies about the firewalls...that's a
very big it depends. Kaboodle uses the open-source echoWare.DLL
to establish a long-term TCP connection with an
Hi Scott,
Understood. The system you describe will work provided that the required
ports are enabled for outgoing access through the firewalls at both ends,
and that someone somewhere is running the echoWare server, which I assume
you provide yourself?
Cheers,
Wez @ RealVNC Ltd.
Wez:
My company provides the echoServer application for anyone to
run (it's Linux-only right now; a Windows one is being worked on). The
idea is that a community of users will have one tech-savvy person who
can run a server so the rest of the community doesn't have to sweat the
details of
Scott,
Fair enough. The only comment I'd make is that the claim that you can
exchange files using Kaboodle without modifying any firewall settings is not
correct - you need the echoServer machine's firewall to be properly
configured to let connections in, and you need to be sure that both ends
Wez:
A fair point: I should more accurately say that with
the echoServer approach, *most* end users will not have to make
any firewall adjustments. The person running the echoServer
may have to, although they are not necessarily an end user
of the client software which uses their server.
All:
I am using VNC 4.0 server at my office workstation.
At my home, I am using VNC 4.0.
I can connect to VNC Server. But I do not see any desktop, it just shows me
blank screen. And I can
Browse through, my mouse movements are happening
I can click on any icon on desktop and it works.
I've been using VNC for a while now and haven't had any problems, until
we became required to use the Mozilla 1.4 browser. Now anytime I launch
a Mozilla browser window through my VNC connection, my session crashes.
Is this a known bug? Is there a solution?
Thanks,
Marjie
Hi!
I'm using vncviewer and X11VNC. I would like to be able to display only a part
of the screen (a definable area). Any one knows if this is possible (and how)?
Thank you in advance,
Sonia.
This message was sent using IMP, the
Marjorie:
I've experienced this behavior with my machine at home. It seems to be
related to Flash Animation. Pages with Flash in them seem to cause Mozilla
to just shut down. I wish I knew why. FWIW, I'm using a variant of VNC at
work and at home, so things might be a bit different.
-Original
Hi it's me again,
now I've tried it by using http://computer-ip:5800.
I still get an error message, but another one: Page can not be displayed.
I've also tried it within my local network. Port 5800 has also been
activated at my Router and incoming connections will be forwarded to my pc.
It's
Chris,
if you've done all the correct port forwarding and have everything else
setup.. the only 2 things i can think of are
1) XP firewall or some other firewall app is blocking the connection
2) (not sure but maybe) I think vnc's http app runs on java i've only used
it a few times and it
Hi Joe!
Thanks for your quick response!
The first item sounds really good, because the error message (Page can not
be displayed) I know, if a page can't be reached (normally blocked by a
firewall)..
I'm using the free Version of Outpost Firewall and VNC is marked there as a
trusted application.
I am looking for a software based on VNC I saw about two years ago but I
forgot its name.
It is a very interesting VNC software. Instead of helping users to access a
remote machine from local (home) machine, that software helps users use two
local machines in a very natural way. User will see
23 matches
Mail list logo
