Re: Request for allocation of new security type code for SASL auth

Den 2008-12-17 11:53 skrev Daniel P. Berrange: On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 08:56:02AM +0100, Peter Rosin wrote: *snip* 1. Is there any compelling reason to *not* sasl_encode/sasl_decode the 6.1.3 SecurityResult message when there is a SSF layer? I think using sasl_encode/sasl_decode on that

Re: Request for allocation of new security type code for SASL auth

On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:19:44PM +0100, Peter Rosin wrote: Den 2008-12-17 11:53 skrev Daniel P. Berrange: On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 08:56:02AM +0100, Peter Rosin wrote: NB, there are only two common SASL mechanisms which provide SSF layers, GSSAPI (Kerberos) and DIGEST-MD5. DIGEST-MD5 is

Re: Request for allocation of new security type code for SASL auth

Hi again! Sigh, sorry to reply to self, I guess the best was to find bugs is to make a public statement of some sort... Den 2008-12-17 08:56 skrev Peter Rosin: --- README.sasl.orig2008-12-17 07:19:28.046875000 +0100 +++ README.sasl.new 2008-12-17 07:21:50.43750 +0100 @@ -174,5

Re: Request for allocation of new security type code for SASL auth

On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 08:56:02AM +0100, Peter Rosin wrote: Hi! Den 2008-12-14 17:53 skrev Daniel P. Berrange: I have defined a mapping of the SASL authentication scheme into the RFB authentication protocol. Please could you allocate an official security type code for use with this auth

Re: Request for allocation of new security type code for SASL auth

On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 09:05:47AM +0100, Peter Rosin wrote: Hi again! Sigh, sorry to reply to self, I guess the best was to find bugs is to make a public statement of some sort... Den 2008-12-17 08:56 skrev Peter Rosin: --- README.sasl.orig 2008-12-17 07:19:28.046875000 +0100 +++

Re: Request for allocation of new security type code for SASL auth

Hi! Den 2008-12-14 17:53 skrev Daniel P. Berrange: I have defined a mapping of the SASL authentication scheme into the RFB authentication protocol. Please could you allocate an official security type code for use with this auth scheme, under the name SASL. *snip* I looked a bit at this and

RE: Request for allocation of new security type code for SASL auth

Hi Daniel, Please use security type number 20. Thanks, -- Wez @ RealVNC Ltd -Original Message- From: vnc-list-ad...@realvnc.com [mailto:vnc-list-ad...@realvnc.com] On Behalf Of Daniel P. Berrange Sent: 14 December 2008 16:54 To: vnc-list@realvnc.com Subject: Request for

Request for allocation of new security type code for SASL auth

I have defined a mapping of the SASL authentication scheme into the RFB authentication protocol. Please could you allocate an official security type code for use with this auth scheme, under the name SASL. There are a number of reasons why it is desirable to support SASL in the RFB protocol -