I needed this patch to compile VNC 4.0 Beta 3 on some platforms.
Tim.
*/
--- vnc-4.0b3-unixsrc/Xregion/Makefile.in.fPIC 2003-03-31 16:07:29.0 +0100
+++ vnc-4.0b3-unixsrc/Xregion/Makefile.in 2003-08-01 10:35:14.0 +0100
@@ -12,4 +12,5 @@
$(AR) $(library) $(OBJS
William Hooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Any thoughts?
I defined `max' in the header before it was used.
___
VNC-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To remove yourself from the list visit:
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
Dave Love said:
William Hooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Any thoughts?
I defined `max' in the header before it was used.
I think this might be a case of too much snipping, but huh? Could you
elaborate?
--
William Hooper
___
VNC-List mailing list
I'm not sure why I ended up with this, but it probably was meant for the list.
Regards,
Beau
-Original Message-
From: MIME :[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:MIME :[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July
31, 2003 5:28 AM
To: Haefke, Beau
Subject:VNC 4.0 Beta 3 My Tests
Dave Love said:
Jerry McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm having compile problems with the unix sources on Gentoo 1.4. I'm
running
the latest stable versions of just about everything... including gcc
3.2.3.
Remove the offending declaration and replace it with an include of
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 08:07:37PM +0100, James Weatherall wrote:
RealVNC is pleased to announce the first public beta release of VNC 4.0.
This is great news!
Do you have an idea of when a final VNC 4.0 release might happen?
Thanks,
Tim. .. off to beta test
*/
[demime 0.99d.1 removed an
Tim Waugh said:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 11:52:26AM -0400, William Hooper wrote:
Using RHL 9 (gcc-3.2.2) that gets me past x0vncserver, but then I get
errors building vncviewer:
make[1]: Entering directory
`/home/whooper/build/vnc-4.0b3-unixsrc/vncviewer'
[snip]
make[1]: *** [CConn.o] Error
Scott,
Your notes omit to mention the ZRLE encoding, which provides equivalent
compression over slow links to the Tight encoding. :)
Cheers,
--
Dr. James Wez Weatherall
RealVNC Ltd. - http://www.realvnc.com - The Home of VNC
--
As William suggests...please feel free to post any
Jeff Boerio [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I also have not been successful at all with HP-UX compiles (don't have
gcc 2.9x for HP). I haven't tried Solaris yet.
The client side doesn't compile with recent versions of the
proprietary compilers on Irix, Tru64 or Solaris. (It is C++, after
all.)
]
Subject: VNC 4.0 Beta 3
RealVNC is pleased to announce the first public beta release
of VNC 4.0.
VNC 4.0 is a complete redesign of the VNC system, but
maintains backwards
compatibility with the old VNC 3 releases.
New features on all platforms:
- Local cursor rendering
- New Java
-Original Message-
From: William Hooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Li, Charles said:
What is the difference between realvnc and tightvnc?
Which is better?
What is the difference between blue and red?
Which is better?
I, as a user, see the next differences:
RealVNC: the
and results in large jumps in position.
Best Regards,
Roland Rosier
-Original Message-
From: Rosier, Roland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 08:54
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: VNC 4.0 Beta 3
Hello all,
Windows tooltips now seem to work in the VNC
I installed the new beta. My gnome session is not working anymore. Only get
the grey X screen and nothing else.
Here is my xstartup:
unset SESSION_MANAGER
exec /etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc
Amy suggestions?
Thanks
AR
___
VNC-List mailing list
I'm having compile problems with the unix sources on Gentoo 1.4. I'm running
the latest stable versions of just about everything... including gcc 3.2.3.
The relavent error follows:
spinner vnc-4.0b3-unixsrc # make
make[1]: Entering directory `/vnc4/vnc-4.0b3-unixsrc/zlib'
make[1]: Nothing to be
Jerry McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm having compile problems with the unix sources on Gentoo 1.4. I'm running
the latest stable versions of just about everything... including gcc 3.2.3.
Remove the offending declaration and replace it with an include of
X11/extensions/XShm.h. I've sent
I have gotten the sources to build on Red Hat 7.1 for both Pentium and
Itanium platforms. gcc 2.96 is what I used successfully for both. I
was NOT able to do this with gcc 3.x and have reported the feedback to
Real VNC.
I also have not been successful at all with HP-UX compiles (don't have
gcc
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 13:48, Mike Miller wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, William Hooper wrote:
Li, Charles said:
What is the difference between realvnc and tightvnc?
Which is better?
What is the difference between blue and red?
They are that different now?
blue and red have been
RealVNC is pleased to announce the first public beta release of VNC 4.0.
VNC 4.0 is a complete redesign of the VNC system, but maintains backwards
compatibility with the old VNC 3 releases.
New features on all platforms:
- Local cursor rendering
- New Java viewer
- Improved performance
-
Li, Charles said:
What is the difference between realvnc and tightvnc?
Which is better?
What is the difference between blue and red?
Which is better?
Sorry to make the point that way, but that is basically what you are
asking. Try both TightVNC and RealVNC and use the one that fits best in
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, William Hooper wrote:
Is there no information on the web that lists the differences?
I doubt it. What's the point, there is no competition between them.
It's not that they are competing to win a prize, but every user has to
make a choice. A web page designed to help
Mike Miller said:
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, William Hooper wrote:
Is there no information on the web that lists the differences?
I doubt it. What's the point, there is no competition between them.
It's not that they are competing to win a prize, but every user has to
make a choice. A web
21 matches
Mail list logo
