...@realvnc.com [mailto:vnc-list-boun...@realvnc.com] On
Behalf Of Philip Herlihy
Sent: 18 May 2009 20:24
To: vnc-list@realvnc.com
Subject: RE: Indirect connection works better
Something else I found: Try this in a command prompt (XP SP1+):
Netsh firewall show icmpsetting
Netsh firewall set
:37
To: vnc-list@realvnc.com
Subject: Re: Indirect connection works better
You have an MTU issue.
If you have access to the router/gateway you need to put a tcp mssadjust
command in the outgoing interface, usually eth0 or something like that
where is the max mtu of you internet connection
[mailto:phi...@herlihy.eu.com]
Sent: 18 May 2009 20:11
To: 'vnc-list@realvnc.com'
Subject: RE: Indirect connection works better
Thanks to John, and James, for very interesting pointers.
I'll experiment on the affected systems and see what I can demonstrate, but
I'd like some feedback on these ideas
...@realvnc.com
To: vnc-list@realvnc.com vnc-list@realvnc.com
Sent: Fri May 15 02:34:03 2009
Subject: Indirect connection works better
Recent came across a situation again which has puzzled me in the
past. I'm
trying to connect to a machine running VNC Free edition in an
office. I can
make
Recent came across a situation again which has puzzled me in the past. I'm
trying to connect to a machine running VNC Free edition in an office. I can
make the connection (having set up port forwarding on the router) but it
hangs, with only the top third of the screen visible after several
: Indirect connection works better
Recent came across a situation again which has puzzled me in the past.
I'm
trying to connect to a machine running VNC Free edition in an office.
I can
make the connection (having set up port forwarding on the router) but
it
hangs, with only the top third
...@realvnc.com [mailto:vnc-list-boun...@realvnc.com] On
Behalf Of James Weatherall
Sent: 14 May 2009 16:21
To: 'Philip Herlihy'; vnc-list@realvnc.com
Subject: RE: Indirect connection works better
Hi Philip,
Some Wi-Fi routers have trouble handling large numbers of small network
packets
...@realvnc.com]
Sent: 14 May 2009 17:24
To: 'Philip Herlihy'; vnc-list@realvnc.com
Subject: RE: Indirect connection works better
Hi Philip,
Sorry to hear that. The difference you've highlighted is that the target
machine is on Wi-Fi, not cable, which can cause issues. You might also
check
: dean.eshel...@gmail.com
Subject: RE: Indirect connection works better
I find this interesting. I have seen this issue and did not know how to fix
it. I do now.
The other issue I have seen is the screen saver stays on and the page does
not refresh after connect. I have found adjusting to a lower
Sent: 14 May 2009 17:09
To: vnc-list@realvnc.com
Subject: RE: Indirect connection works better
Thanks, Wez - however, in response to guidance you gave me once before
I
already have that setting enabled.
What puzzles me is that either route is using the same links, so it's
hard
machine
giving you problems.
Cheers,
John
- Original Message -
From: vnc-list-boun...@realvnc.com vnc-list-boun...@realvnc.com
To: vnc-list@realvnc.com vnc-list@realvnc.com
Sent: Fri May 15 02:34:03 2009
Subject: Indirect connection works better
Recent came across a situation again which
11 matches
Mail list logo