HF> That is not the case in 256. A call within Huntsville is not LD,
HF> but a call to Decatur is LD and you must dial 1-256-xxx-.
yes, i should have been more explicit that every state puc does its own
thing for such stuff...
-JimC
--
James Cloos OpenPGP: 0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 12:07 PM James Cloos via VoiceOps
wrote:
> except thsat it is 10 for the same npa and 11 for other npas, irreguardless
> of whether the call costs anything.
>
> at least in the npas w/ which i am familiar.
That is not the case in 256. A call within Huntsville is not LD,
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 4:45 PM Hunter Fuller via VoiceOps <
voiceops@voiceops.org> wrote:
> I hate to tell y'all this, but not only do my users dial 9 from their
> faxes to get out, they also fax internally (interdepartmentally) with
> some frequency. So, yes, these users dial 4 digits from
I hate to tell y'all this, but not only do my users dial 9 from their
faxes to get out, they also fax internally (interdepartmentally) with
some frequency. So, yes, these users dial 4 digits from their fax
machines.
Look. I get that the dial-9 thing is not how you would build a system
today, but
On 7/17/22 23:43, Hunter Fuller wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 1:19 AM Jay Hennigan wrote:
Kinda, sorta. 7-digit local dialing is supposed to have been phased out,
with all NANP numbers represented as 1+NPA-NXX-.
But, speaking of en-banc dialing on cell phones, do you find that
users
On 7/17/22 23:38, Hunter Fuller wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 1:03 AM Ross Tajvar wrote:
re: dialing 9 - I understand the plight of having to deal with legacy
expectations, but what's the point of sticking with this particular
one? What makes it not-useless?
In our circumstance, all of the
