Re: [VoiceOps] SHAKEN/STIR

You want STIR/SHAKEN to be entertaining?  — Sent from mobile, with due apologies for brevity and errors. > On Jun 17, 2019, at 8:02 AM, Dovid Bender wrote: > > Hi, > > Does anyone know if there are any email lists for SHAKEN/STIR. All I have > seen so far is the RFC's and the IETF which is

[VoiceOps] SHAKEN/STIR

Hi, Does anyone know if there are any email lists for SHAKEN/STIR. All I have seen so far is the RFC's and the IETF which is very bland. I am looking to see if there are any groups that are working on possible libs for SHAEKN/STIR as well as OSS to make things a bit easier. TIA. Regards, Dovid

Re: [VoiceOps] [EXTERNAL] VoiceOps Digest, Vol 118, Issue 8

Cant say it's 100% correct, but based on LERG8's V & H coordinates, the two rate centers are 482 miles apart. It also shows that each rate center has two unique NPA's in them as well. I would think they would not be in the same local calling area, but I don't know Canadian tarrifs. Using a

Re: [VoiceOps] 605-562 - Arbitrage scam?

I am not sure if this is feasible for someone to do easily so I do not bother you too much... but does anyone have a spreadsheet of the nanp npa-nxx(s) you keep a very close eye on for fraud? I am not sure how well we keep an eye on such things here. I would like to explore it more. Naturally

Re: [VoiceOps] ATA To Connect to Mitel PBX

This link is relevant to your issue https://supportforums.adtran.com/thread/2264 > On Jun 17, 2019, at 9:36 PM, Nate Burke wrote: > > Sorry for Dredging up an old post. I've had the Adtran TA908 (2nd gen) > installed to the MITEL for about a month, but now I'm starting to hear about >

Re: [VoiceOps] 605-562 - Arbitrage scam?

To be fair with our aggressive fraud controls and our honeypots that are linked to our DDoS control system that nullroute SIP scanners, etc we don't see fraud much at all (it used to hit us a LOT, but we slow down scanners quite a bit), and most of what we do catch is speedruns toward NGNs and

Re: [VoiceOps] ATA To Connect to Mitel PBX

Sorry for Dredging up an old post. I've had the Adtran TA908 (2nd gen) installed to the MITEL for about a month, but now I'm starting to hear about problems. In Certain call scenarios, the MITEL is not disconnecting the Trunk port, even though a call has ended. The Mitel consultant is

Re: [VoiceOps] 605-562 - Arbitrage scam?

Jumping in on this one late – Pine Ridge is most well-known for the Ogala Lakota reservation that is located there. Numbers are in fact owned by Native American Telecom which is tribally owned and has had traffic pumping charges levelled against them as someone else mentioned. Payday lenders

Re: [VoiceOps] SHAKEN/STIR

https://www.sipforum.org/activities/technical-wg-overview-and-charter/atissip-forum-nni-task-force-charter/ You may need Sipforum or ATIS membership to get in. [image: BandwidthBlue.png] James Milko • Sr. Director, IP and Voice Network Engineering 900 Main Campus Drive, Suite 100,

[VoiceOps] Port PS replacement

I thought I remembered coming across a new portal, something like number blocks or chex or something. I was able to lookup both the current LRN as well as history. Does anyone on list know about this? Sean Salvadalena ___ VoiceOps mailing list

Re: [VoiceOps] LCA file for Broadworks across provinces / states

Le 19-06-14 à 15 h 41, Mark R Lindsey, ECG a écrit : Are both SHERBROOKE ‘s in the same LATA number? BroadWorks distinguishes the same names based on LATA. E.g., there are tons of “Springfield”s and “Albany”s in the US and Canada but in different LATAs. Thanks for taking my question Mark.