Re: [VoiceOps] Homer vs VoIPMonitor

2015-12-02 Thread Marco Teixeira
Let's just hope other commercially motivated folks on the list refrain from sending a 300KB attachment as an excuse to slip in their product name... please :) =Marco On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Richard Jobson wrote: > Hello Colton, > > At the risk of overwhelming

Re: [VoiceOps] SIP provider that will route to free conference services

2015-12-02 Thread Calvin Ellison
"it just rings and rings and never answers" Can you tell if the ringback is pre-session media or post-answer? That seems like FAS, or the conference bridge might be doing something pre-session, like prompting for a bridge ID, and someone is masking that pre-session media with a ringback.

Re: [VoiceOps] SIP provider that will route to free conference services

2015-12-02 Thread Evan P. Hall
We do offer conferencing, but these customers are needing to join large conferences arranged by business partners or vendors and they are not able to influence the service used. Here is one of the phone numbers: 712-775-7031. I have a carrier that rejects it outright and 2 that it just rings

[VoiceOps] HPBX over ADSL

2015-12-02 Thread Anthony Orlando via VoiceOps
Is anyone having success deploying HPBX over DSL?  Not service providers that own the plant but those of you using another providers DSL.  Have you been successful?  If so what were the engineering guidelines you used?  What were the tolerances you used?  Any feedback would be very

Re: [VoiceOps] SIP provider that will route to free conference services

2015-12-02 Thread Jared Geiger
Get in touch with Widevoice. A couple years ago we were having trouble getting quality calls to certain conference destinations. They handle most of the traffic to these destinations and a handful of NPANXXs. They gave us a specific rate deck for many of these conference codes. On Wed, Dec 2,

Re: [VoiceOps] SIP provider that will route to free conference services

2015-12-02 Thread Paul Timmins
Then they should charge a rate relative to the costs of terminating it and route it without discrimination. Hence the point of the FCC's order. > On Dec 2, 2015, at 20:21, Colin Brown wrote: > > that's because 712-775 is an expensive rate. > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at

Re: [VoiceOps] SIP provider that will route to free conference services

2015-12-02 Thread Carlos Alvarez
I made three calls with PDD maybe 2-3 seconds on Onvoy. Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 2, 2015, at 7:21 PM, Nathan Anderson wrote: > > That number seems to work for me from Flowroute. But it *does* take an awful > long time to connect, like they are trying to go down through

Re: [VoiceOps] SIP provider that will route to free conference services

2015-12-02 Thread Nathan Anderson
Right. 'swhat I said. :) -- Nathan -Original Message- From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Alex Balashov Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2015 7:14 PM To: voiceops@voiceops.org Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] SIP provider that will route to free conference services

Re: [VoiceOps] SIP provider that will route to free conference services

2015-12-02 Thread Alex Balashov
‎I would guess the PDD is upstream LCR hunting through a large amount of vendors who fail to take the call before finding one that will take it. ‎ -- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC 303 Perimeter Center North, Suite 300 Atlanta, GA 30346 United States Tel: +1-800-250-5920 

Re: [VoiceOps] USF and Minimum Billing

2015-12-02 Thread Paul Timmins
IANAL but that's how I read it too. USF is to be levied on interstate services (of which voip is automatically because internet) and a contract shortfall is neither federal in jurisdiction nor a telecommunications service. > On Dec 2, 2015, at 19:23, Peter Beckman wrote:

Re: [VoiceOps] SIP provider that will route to free conference services

2015-12-02 Thread Nathan Anderson
6 seconds here. Though I could swear when I tried it earlier it was even longer than that. -- Nathan From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Carlos Alvarez Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2015 7:07 PM To: voiceops@voiceops.org Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] SIP provider that

Re: [VoiceOps] SIP provider that will route to free conference services

2015-12-02 Thread John Levine
In article you write: >We have a few customers who need to reach free conference call services and >none of our current carriers will route the calls. >Are there any providers out there that will take these calls via SIP? We are

[VoiceOps] USF and Minimum Billing

2015-12-02 Thread Peter Beckman
Hey Folks -- I've got a carrier to which I've made a minimum commitment. I didn't get around to getting my spend up to the commit, and when my contract renewed, they billed me a minimum commit fee. Understandable, and I'm fine paying it. I didn't get anything for it -- zero telecom-related