Let's just hope other commercially motivated folks on the list refrain from
sending a 300KB attachment as an excuse to slip in their product name...
please :)
=Marco
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Richard Jobson
wrote:
> Hello Colton,
>
> At the risk of overwhelming
"it just rings and rings and never answers"
Can you tell if the ringback is pre-session media or post-answer? That
seems like FAS, or the conference bridge might be doing something
pre-session, like prompting for a bridge ID, and someone is masking that
pre-session media with a ringback.
We do offer conferencing, but these customers are needing to join large
conferences arranged by business partners or vendors and they are not able to
influence the service used.
Here is one of the phone numbers: 712-775-7031. I have a carrier that rejects
it outright and 2 that it just rings
Is anyone having success deploying HPBX over DSL? Not service providers that
own the plant but those of you using another providers DSL. Have you been
successful? If so what were the engineering guidelines you used? What were
the tolerances you used? Any feedback would be very
Get in touch with Widevoice. A couple years ago we were having trouble
getting quality calls to certain conference destinations. They handle most
of the traffic to these destinations and a handful of NPANXXs. They gave us
a specific rate deck for many of these conference codes.
On Wed, Dec 2,
Then they should charge a rate relative to the costs of terminating it and
route it without discrimination. Hence the point of the FCC's order.
> On Dec 2, 2015, at 20:21, Colin Brown wrote:
>
> that's because 712-775 is an expensive rate.
>
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at
I made three calls with PDD maybe 2-3 seconds on Onvoy.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 2, 2015, at 7:21 PM, Nathan Anderson wrote:
>
> That number seems to work for me from Flowroute. But it *does* take an awful
> long time to connect, like they are trying to go down through
Right. 'swhat I said. :)
-- Nathan
-Original Message-
From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Alex Balashov
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2015 7:14 PM
To: voiceops@voiceops.org
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] SIP provider that will route to free conference services
I would guess the PDD is upstream LCR hunting through a large amount of
vendors who fail to take the call before finding one that will take it.
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
303 Perimeter Center North, Suite 300
Atlanta, GA 30346
United States
Tel: +1-800-250-5920
IANAL but that's how I read it too. USF is to be levied on interstate services
(of which voip is automatically because internet) and a contract shortfall is
neither federal in jurisdiction nor a telecommunications service.
> On Dec 2, 2015, at 19:23, Peter Beckman wrote:
6 seconds here. Though I could swear when I tried it earlier it was even
longer than that.
-- Nathan
From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Carlos
Alvarez
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2015 7:07 PM
To: voiceops@voiceops.org
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] SIP provider that
In article
you write:
>We have a few customers who need to reach free conference call services and
>none of our current carriers will route the calls.
>Are there any providers out there that will take these calls via SIP? We are
Hey Folks --
I've got a carrier to which I've made a minimum commitment. I didn't get
around to getting my spend up to the commit, and when my contract renewed,
they billed me a minimum commit fee. Understandable, and I'm fine paying
it. I didn't get anything for it -- zero telecom-related
13 matches
Mail list logo