Re: [VoiceOps] Connecting to Remote Tandems

2019-08-09 Thread Mike Hammett
I wanted to note that I am still interested in working with competitive tandem providers for "on-net" calls... calls among their customers, without ever hitting an ILEC tandem. Also, now that I look at their web page... it says it allows me to receive both local and long distance calls using

Re: [VoiceOps] Connecting to Remote Tandems

2019-08-09 Thread Mike Hammett
*nods* I suspect we'll be keeping our own SS7 for a while. We're already in the CO for other reasons and there are more points of failure than a circuit from one room to the other. As you alluded to, if I'm already there, it's hard for them to do it any cheaper than I am. *sigh* The world

Re: [VoiceOps] Connecting to Remote Tandems

2019-08-09 Thread Mike Hammett
*nods* If I'm not using a third party tandem provider for the local tandem, then I have to build it myself (whether it's actual collocation or just dropping trunks on some transport provider). Since I already did all of that work, why have that third party do the access tandem... since I'm

Re: [VoiceOps] Connecting to Remote Tandems

2019-08-09 Thread Mike Hammett
In our home turf, the same entity is operating local and long distance tandems (I hear it's even the same chassis, just a different blade), so locally, I wouldn't really be avoiding dealing with the ILEC. I understand that may not always be the case. I'd assume it would be fairly common,

Re: [VoiceOps] Connecting to Remote Tandems

2019-08-09 Thread Mary Lou Carey
I forgot to mention one more thing..if the third party tandem provider is handling the local and intraLATA traffic for you as well as the FGD traffic, then you don't have to mess with managing your own SS7 network or programming your switch for the PSTN routing. MARY LOU CAREY BackUP

Re: [VoiceOps] Connecting to Remote Tandems

2019-08-09 Thread Mary Lou Carey
There are a couple differences for various reasons. In the LERG there are actually 3 tandems listed: One for Local, One for IntraLATA, and one for FGD traffic. When you interconnect with only the ILEC, they only have you establish 2 trunk groups. A local tandem trunk group that handles the

Re: [VoiceOps] Connecting to Remote Tandems

2019-08-09 Thread Paul Timmins
I'm sure I know which one you're talking about. It's because they exist in entirely different regulatory domains. The upside of inbound feature group D is that you get to cut out a terrible ILEC tandem, and at least the vendor I'm thinking of doesn't charge for the trunks themselves, so you're

[VoiceOps] Connecting to Remote Tandems

2019-08-09 Thread Mike Hammett
I'm evaluating methods of extending our footprint. I purposely left out company names. One of the companies we talked to was really only interested in getting us the inbound long distance calls, not the local ones. Well, they would, but the terms were vastly different. Given that I still