That's a bit hard to parse but it appears to also say, "set aside for toll
free" = NO
Sigh. If you match up the columns, it says ASSIGNABLE No, Explanation Set
aside for toll free, RESERVED No, Assigned No.
NANPA's own announcement confirms 886 (and 889) was eliminated from toll
free pool
Thanks for the info. I'm sure why the codes started popping up in at least
5 Tier 1 International rate decks about 6 months ago. At least now I know
why they exist.
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 11:02 AM Paul Timmins
wrote:
> 11xx codes are a pulse dial substitute for the matching *xx code. so 1167
>
11xx codes are a pulse dial substitute for the matching *xx code. so 1167 sets
the privacy flag just like *67 does. They're not dialable outside of a class 5
end user.
(12xx replaces the #)
From: VoiceOps on behalf of Jared Geiger
Sent: Friday, July 24,
Semi related:
Depending on the International vendor, I see the codes 108, 109, 1129,
1139, 1171, 1172, 1173, 1178 being claimed as either valid codes in Canada
or the US. I haven't found much information on them but I believe they are
special in Canada dial codes for certain services and would
That's a bit hard to parse but it appears to also say, "set aside for toll
free" = NO
NANPA's own announcement confirms 886 (and 889) was eliminated from toll
free pool in 2001 and released back to unused inventory in 2003-
https://www.nationalnanpa.com/pdf/PL_329.pdf
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at
Is anyone but T-Mobile and Comcast (and now us) doing STIR/SHAKEN right now and
want to make test calls? We're on Inteliquent if that helps.
-Paul
Paul Timmins
Senior Network Engineer
Clear Rate Communications
Direct: (248) 556-4532
Customer Support: (877) 877-4799
24 Hour Repair: (866)
I think you misread that 886 is reserved for TF. It was released from TF
reservation in 2003 and us currently unassigned so could pop up anywhere as a
new code.
If that is the case, you should tell NANPA. I just downloaded their NPA
database, dated today. It says:
Reference for 886 being available: https://www.nationalnanpa.com/pdf/PL_329.pdf
> On Jul 24, 2020, at 9:28 AM, Brandon Svec wrote:
>
> I think you misread that 886 is reserved for TF. It was released from TF
> reservation in 2003 and us currently unassigned so could pop up anywhere as a
>
I think you misread that 886 is reserved for TF. It was released from TF
reservation in 2003 and us currently unassigned so could pop up anywhere as a
new code.
-bjs
> On Jul 24, 2020, at 9:22 AM, John Levine wrote:
>
> In article
> you
> write:
>> Does anyone know if area code 886 was
In article
you write:
>Does anyone know if area code 886 was allocated to Canada and if yes where
>in Canada? We were just told by an international vendor that it is a new
>area code in Canada yet I can't find anything on it.
You can check the definitive NANPA list at https://nationalnanpa.com/
My go to site for Canadian Numbering
http://www.cnac.ca/co_codes/co_code_status.htm
On Fri., Jul. 24, 2020, 5:57 a.m. Dovid Bender, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone know if area code 886 was allocated to Canada and if yes where
> in Canada? We were just told by an international vendor that it is a
Hi,
Does anyone know if area code 886 was allocated to Canada and if yes where
in Canada? We were just told by an international vendor that it is a new
area code in Canada yet I can't find anything on it.
TIA.
Dovid
___
VoiceOps mailing list
12 matches
Mail list logo
