ZipWhip
-Original Message-
From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Brian Taylor
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 07:48
To: voiceops@voiceops.org
Subject: [VoiceOps] Landline SMS
We're looking at offering some SMS/Text Messaging services to our landline
I would be hesitant to extend an Ethernet connection for a SIP phone outside of
the secured building perimeter without mitigating the potential security risks
to the network. Much better to use one of any number of existing products
which use an analog phone line; and connect it back to an ATA
It turns out that the majority of the bad From: numbers (from one carrier) are
apparently spoofed CLIDs associated with scam calls. Some of them are
identified in the various "Who Called Me" lists, others are completely invalid.
Many also have "p=+1 613555" in their SDP, which is obviously
If you click on the ‘Merge’ dropdown while displaying the Legs by Header, you
can select ‘SIP History’ to display the SIP Ladder diagram of all the legs
together.
David
From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Matthew
Beckwell
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2018 1:02 PM
For those that don't know, RAY BAUMS Act is a new regulation that impacts
Emergency Calling. It mandates that a "Dispatchable Location" be included with
information to the PSAP when a 9-1-1 call is made in the US. The deadline for
compliance is August 1, 2020 (or August 1, 2021 for some
“For example, we have a customer whose manufacturing facility is well over the
size that would allow a phone or two as legal coverage. They have balked at
putting phones out ever 6-7k square feet on poles and such. Is that our
problem? I don't think so.”
I don’t believe that there is any
am still requesting the same info from the other providers.
David
From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Zilk, David
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2020 7:02 AM
To: Andy Brezinsky ; voiceops@voiceops.org
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Three Digit Numbers
The FCC provides this list
There are three requirements for a Service Provider to be included in the
SHAKEN ecosystem:
1. Service Provider must have an OCN
2. Service Provider must have a current Form 499-A filed with the FCC
3. Service Provider must have direct access to telephone numbers from the
I like your data collection, but I would also add 711 as there is a FCC mandate
to support the relay services for the deaf.
David
From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Andy
Brezinsky
Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 11:59 AM
To: voiceops@voiceops.org
Subject: Re:
The FCC provides this list of all the state relay service numbers.
https://www.fcc.gov/general/telecommunications-relay-services-directory
David
From: Andy Brezinsky [mailto:a...@mbrez.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 8:40 PM
To: Zilk, David ; voiceops@voiceops.org
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps
Twelve is special. It is also the largest one syllable number. Just sayin.
(BTW: I had to look up what an abundant number was.)
From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Brian Tate
(Eng)
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2020 9:42 AM
To: Hiers, David ; Brian Knight
Cc:
It looks like the mandate for 988 will simply need to translate to
1-800-273-TALK, which will be easy to implement.
How are people complying with mandates for 711 and 811 which need to be
translated to different numbers in different jurisdictions? Configure each
customer individually based on
Replace “robocalls” with “spoofed calls” and you would be correct. A service
provider can legitimately provide A attestation to calls that turn out to be
illegal robocalls, as long as the caller can legitimately use the number they
are calling from. At that point the traceback functionality
In my neighborhood the smoke signal bandwidth is saturated. Cough cough.
-Original Message-
From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Alex Balashov
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2020 11:38 AM
To: voiceops@voiceops.org
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Got my first inbound
Having come into telephony from the data networking end, rather than from a
PSTN telephony background, where would one find a good basic to detailed
tutorial of how routing of VoIP calls into the PSTN and vice versa works?
I have so far only been involved with routing from our SIP platform to
We are seeing about 10%-15% of outbound calls to Verizon receiving 606
responses.
It appears that Verizon has a VoIP Gateway outage that they are investigating.
David
___
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org
We are looking for a consultant to assist in the process of implementing
STIR/SHAKEN in our network. Has anyone used any consultants for STIR/SHAKEN
that they were particularly happy with?
David
___
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org
The FCC is mandating that service providers must fully implement STIR/SHAKEN or
certify that they are taking reasonable steps to avoid originating illegal
robocall traffic in the portions of their network where STIR/SHAKEN can't be
implemented. They have also declined to specify what those
We are making SHAKEN attestation/verification requests using the REST interface
via Oracle SBCs and are experiencing "Unsuccessful Verifications" for a
significant portion of our calls. This doesn't mean that the verification
failed, as in the cert was wrong or the calling number in the
I am working with a provider that wants to see PAI and not RPID, however we
receive calls from a different provider that sends us RPID. Can I simply copy
the RPID header into PAI so that all the necessary screen= and privacy=
parameters are preserved when forwarding the call from the second
came from some other (non-partner) service provider) isn’t a
reasonable assumption.
David
From: Mark Lindsey
Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 2022 10:16 AM
To: Zilk, David ; voiceops@voiceops.org
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] [EXTERNAL] Identity Header Test Tool
The primary problem to fix, in this scenario
I am getting results from a test to the Bandwidth number that are confusing. It
appears that our Identity header is not making it through to them, however the
call does have an Identity header, certified by Bandwith, with B attestation.
This is odd as we don't have any direct business
Zilk
CDK Global/IP Networked Services
From: Mark Lindsey
Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 2022 9:58 AM
To: Zilk, David
Cc: voiceops@voiceops.org
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] [EXTERNAL] Identity Header Test Tool
I expect Bandwidth is attesting that they know the identity of the SIP trunking
provider that sent
How are folks dealing with allowing calls to 9-8-8 when an access code of 9 is
used. Does this not cause a conflict when calling toll free numbers beginning
with an NPA of 88x?
David
___
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org
regard to
9-8-8.
So, while it is not required for MLTS to support both 9-988 and 988. I still
feel that it is a good idea to do so if feasible.
David Zilk
From: Brandon Svec
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2022 9:21 AM
To: Zilk, David
Cc: VoiceOps@voiceops.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [VoiceOps] 9-8-8 d
25 matches
Mail list logo
