I completely agree. The support for the C15 is some of the best we get
from all our vendors. They’re pretty much the only vendor where an actual
engineer answers the support line when you call in - ie no voicemail tree
unless all of them are currently on the phone. About the only thing they
I feel I should also mention that even though the C15's CLI is a
bit...old school, the platform is quite robust. Especially if you are
using SIP, there are very few failure modes that would cause a service
impacting event. Everything is redundant and can generally shift the
call flows around
> On Dec 23, 2021, at 18:52, Jeff Brower wrote:
>
> Mike-
>
>> I believe this comes from the era when RAM was limited and only one
>> overlay/program could be loaded from the tape drive at a time
>
> "tape drive" ... that's not an era, that's an epoch :-)
Not that long ago. QIC drives were
Mike-
I believe this comes from the era when RAM was limited and only one
overlay/program could be loaded from the tape drive at a time
"tape drive" ... that's not an era, that's an epoch :-)
-Jeff
Quoting Mike Johnston :
On 2021-12-23 08:08, Shawn L wrote:
The C15/20 series is still
8:31 PM
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Vendor Pros\Cons
On 2021-12-23 08:08, Shawn L wrote:
> The C15/20 series is still pretty much all CLI, despite the fact that
> they've been saying they've had a GUI for years (awful, awful
> java-based thing).
The C15's CLI is not very intuitive, be
On 2021-12-23 08:08, Shawn L wrote:
The C15/20 series is still pretty much all CLI, despite the fact that
they've been saying they've had a GUI for years (awful, awful
java-based thing).
The C15's CLI is not very intuitive, being a living relic of its DMS
heritage. There are different
@Mike I'm always open to chat re: Netsapiens but as (I think) you know
we are a pure SIP environment. I think every vendor is going to have
some "the grass is always greener on the other side" but we have a few
engineers at ISPs with background on Meta that have said a lot of
positive things
l.
From: VoiceOps On Behalf Of Matthew Crocker
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2021 12:49 PM
To: Peter Rad ; voiceops@voiceops.org
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Vendor Pros\Cons
EXTERNAL EMAIL - Use caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or
sharing sensitive information.
We were a VocalData (ak
We were a VocalData (aka Tekelec T6k, aka Genband M6, aka Broadsoft M6) shop
that migrated to Broadworks. We moved from Broadworks to Cisco PaaS
(Broadworks) 4 years ago. I just purchased Netsapiens with their fully
managed solution and will be migrating customers away from Cisco PaaS to
| Local. Trusted. Professional.
From: VoiceOps On Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2021 11:15 AM
To: voiceops@voiceops.org
Subject: [VoiceOps] Vendor Pros\Cons
EXTERNAL EMAIL - Use caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or
sharing sensitive information.
We've been
Metaswitch will soon be running on Azure for Operators
Ribbon
Cisco/BSFT or talk to Averistar about running BroadWorks for you
Alianza
netsapiens (now CXDO)
2600Hz (Kazoo)
cloudya by NFON
Biscom
WLC
and a few smaller others
On 12/17/2021 2:15 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
We've been running
On Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2021 2:15 PM
To: voiceops@voiceops.org
Subject: [VoiceOps] Vendor Pros\Cons
We've been running Metaswitch for 15 years and are looking to refresh what we
have.
Who else operates at that tier? I'm talking to Ribbon. I'm hesitant to talk
We've been running Metaswitch for 15 years and are looking to refresh what we
have.
Who else operates at that tier? I'm talking to Ribbon. I'm hesitant to talk to
to Broadsoft because they're part of Cisco, but if I should, I should...
Obviously, there are rather limited venues to gain
13 matches
Mail list logo
