Alright notes taken so far is to obtain a static IP with the wireless
carrier to avoid their Carrier Grade NAT. We already paid $500 to get
static IPs from Verizon, so we are good to go there.
In addition use TCP for SIP. I believe we already use TCP for the SIP
signaling as we use the
On 7/27/14 11:14 AM, Colton Conor wrote:
I assume we are going to be dealing with alot of packet loss whether its
going to 3G or 4G. We are also going to be dealing with high latency on
3G. Since we have no control over both of these issues, what other
recommendations do you have? I have
On the other hand, if you can get SIP/TLS over TCP going, do in fact do that.
You'll work around a lot of NAT and ALG issues because the ALGs can't see the
traffic. Most of them don't even look at 5060/tcp as well, so TCP is often
enough.
TCP is good for being behind multiple layers of NAT
+1 on using TCP for traversing many layers of NAT of varying quality +
getting around the infantile thumb-sucking that passes for
ALG-assisted NAT traversal.
--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/
