Re: [VoiceOps] Definition: Local Calls

2020-12-10 Thread Mary Lou Carey
It was done in a series of phases that ended in July 2018. See the link 
below:


https://www.dwt.com/insights/2011/11/intercarrier-compensation-reformsphasedown-of-term


MARY LOU CAREY
BackUP Telecom Consulting
Office: 615-791-9969
Cell: 615-796-

On 2020-12-08 02:56 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:

On 12/8/20 1:48 PM, Mary Lou Carey wrote:


No one can bill end office switching now


When and how did this come to pass?

It was my understanding that the problem with taking a more expansive
view of LCAs than the ILEC led precisely to this problem; you'd be
paying switched access on calls to end-offices whose V relative to
the originating switch is not within the ILEC's LCA.

___
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops


Re: [VoiceOps] Definition: Local Calls

2020-12-10 Thread Mary Lou Carey
That's a good point. It depends on whether you're in a metropolitan area 
or a very rural area where there's no local tandem. In most LATAs where 
AT and Verizon are the main ILEC, the small ILECs will use the ILEC 
tandem to pick up traffic. But there are a lot of the rural areas 
(especially in the old Qwest territory) where the larger towns are so 
much farther apart that they didn't put in local tandems. So you had to 
trunk everything directly to the end office or through an access tandem 
if you had SPOP. If the small ILECs had multiple end offices, they might 
have even put in their own tandem for just their area.


So you definitely need to check out the routing information in the LERG 
before you make any assumptions about what rate centers are encompassed 
in a tandem area.


MARY LOU CAREY
BackUP Telecom Consulting
Office: 615-791-9969
Cell: 615-796-

On 2020-12-09 10:25 AM, John Levine wrote:

In article
<1038462169.17163.1607448901620.JavaMail.mhammett@Thunderfuck2> you
write:
My operating theory is that if it's on the same tandem switch, I might 
as well treat it as local.


If only. At my rural ILEC, the next town up is a remote from the
switch in my town but for historical reasons they are not local to
each other so at least for people who haven't switched to bundled
plans, calls between them take a 150 mile detour to the tandem and
back.

That particular tandem also covers places 250 miles from here. I guess
it's nice if that's local.

R's,
John
___
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops

___
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops


Re: [VoiceOps] Definition: Local Calls

2020-12-09 Thread Mike Hammett
Our LATA is only about 80 miles wide. There are two tandems and we're based out 
of the same CO as the larger of the two. Ours has the biggest towns and 
something like 75% of all of the rate centers. It's just a cross connect away. 
:-) 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



Midwest Internet Exchange 
http://www.midwest-ix.com 



- Original Message -

From: "John Levine"  
To: voiceops@voiceops.org 
Cc: voice...@ics-il.net 
Sent: Wednesday, December 9, 2020 10:25:27 AM 
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Definition: Local Calls 

In article <1038462169.17163.1607448901620.JavaMail.mhammett@Thunderfuck2> you 
write: 
>My operating theory is that if it's on the same tandem switch, I might as well 
>treat it as local. 

If only. At my rural ILEC, the next town up is a remote from the 
switch in my town but for historical reasons they are not local to 
each other so at least for people who haven't switched to bundled 
plans, calls between them take a 150 mile detour to the tandem and 
back. 

That particular tandem also covers places 250 miles from here. I guess 
it's nice if that's local. 

R's, 
John 

___
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops


Re: [VoiceOps] Definition: Local Calls

2020-12-09 Thread John Levine
In article <1038462169.17163.1607448901620.JavaMail.mhammett@Thunderfuck2> you 
write:
>My operating theory is that if it's on the same tandem switch, I might as well 
>treat it as local. 

If only. At my rural ILEC, the next town up is a remote from the
switch in my town but for historical reasons they are not local to
each other so at least for people who haven't switched to bundled
plans, calls between them take a 150 mile detour to the tandem and
back.

That particular tandem also covers places 250 miles from here. I guess
it's nice if that's local.

R's,
John
___
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops


Re: [VoiceOps] Definition: Local Calls

2020-12-08 Thread Alex Balashov

On 12/8/20 1:48 PM, Mary Lou Carey wrote:


No one can bill end office switching now


When and how did this come to pass?

It was my understanding that the problem with taking a more expansive 
view of LCAs than the ILEC led precisely to this problem; you'd be 
paying switched access on calls to end-offices whose V relative to the 
originating switch is not within the ILEC's LCA.


--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC

Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
___
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops


Re: [VoiceOps] Definition: Local Calls

2020-12-08 Thread Mary Lou Carey
Its safe to treat anything in the same tandem area as local. No one can 
bill end office switching now so having it associated with the correct 
tandem is the only thing that matters anyways.


MARY LOU CAREY
BackUP Telecom Consulting
Office: 615-791-9969
Cell: 615-796-

On 2020-12-08 11:52 AM, Paul Timmins wrote:

Local calling areas are defined in the CLEC tariff filed with the
state. Most CLECs mirror the ILEC local calling areas. Check your
tariffs to see what the PUC approved you to do.

On 12/8/20 12:35 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:


Is there any legal definition as to what constitutes local calls?

I know that Local Calling Guide reports on what the ILECs treat as
local, but I don't know if there's anything that is requiring me to
have the same definition.

My operating theory is that if it's on the same tandem switch, I
might as well treat it as local.

For reporting purposes (state and federal) would local calls be
treated as intrastate calls when not otherwise broken out?

-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.com

___
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops

___
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops

___
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops


Re: [VoiceOps] Definition: Local Calls

2020-12-08 Thread Paul Timmins
Local calling areas are defined in the CLEC tariff filed with the state. 
Most CLECs mirror the ILEC local calling areas. Check your tariffs to 
see what the PUC approved you to do.


On 12/8/20 12:35 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:

Is there any legal definition as to what constitutes local calls?

I know that Local Calling Guide reports on what the ILECs treat as 
local, but I don't know if there's anything that is requiring me to 
have the same definition.



My operating theory is that if it's on the same tandem switch, I might 
as well treat it as local.



For reporting purposes (state and federal) would local calls be 
treated as intrastate calls when not otherwise broken out?




-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.com




___
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops



___
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops