Posted by Eugene Volokh:
Regents' Veto of Erwin Chemerinsky as Dean of the New UCI Law School:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2007_09_09-2007_09_15.shtml#1189636190


   Some tentative, and very quick (I have to run to an event) thoughts,
   which I hope to supplement later:

   1. From my colleague Steve Yeazell: "In some ways Erwin will come out
   of it much better than Chancellor Drake or Irvine. Think about being
   the next person Drake calls to offer the deanship: even if you are in
   fact the very best person for the job, no one is going to believe
   that, and everyone is going to think that you were the politically
   expedient candidate, something that will make it much, much harder to
   recruit good faculty. This is a very bad day for Irvine (and for UC),
   no matter why it happened."

   2. Also from Steve: "[T]he failure to preclear an important nomination
   like a founding dean with Regents suggests a rather modest level of
   administrative acumen [on the UCI administration side], something that
   the next decanal nominee might consider far more important than the
   'academic freedom' issues."

   3. This having been said, while I hope to have more to say on the
   First Amendment and academic freedom issues, I should caution against
   treating Deanships or Chairships the same way as scholarly positions.
   As the Second Circuit correctly held in Jeffries v. Harleston (cite
   and details later), the two are quite different. It is generally not
   proper, for instance, to refuse to appoint a professor because he's
   too controversial; but it may well be proper to avoid deans who are
   lightning rods for criticism, or likely to run into trouble with the
   Legislature or with others.

   The example I give is Dean Ken Starr of Pepperdine. If he wanted to
   move to UCLA, I'd be delighted -- but if the faculty, the
   administration, or the Regents opposed such an appointment on the
   grounds that he'd be too controversial, and the controversy would get
   in the way of his effectiveness, I would not condemn their position as
   a breach of academic freedom, or of the First Amendment.

   As I said, have to run; more later, I hope.

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
Volokh@lists.powerblogs.com
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to