Re: [volt-nuts] Vibrating reed electrometers

2018-03-08 Thread ed breya
Curiosity forced me to look around a little more for info on the 640. 
The first link includes some info on the 640 with pictures. The 
vibrating capacitor thing looks like a sort of vacuum tube. I thought 
maybe it was custom made by or for Keithley, but it seems to actually 
have been an off-shelf commercial product. The second link shows 
pictures of what it likely is - XL7900, made by Philips back then. The 
third link is to the data sheet that explains a lot.


https://doc.xdevs.com/doc/_Metrology/femto_ampere_current_source.pdf

http://lampes-et-tubes.info/sp/sp003.php?l=e

http://frank.pocnet.net/sheets/009/x/XL7900.pdf

I also found some info on the Varian/Cary 401 vibrating reed type 
electrometer. It seems it was very common and used in a lot of 
applications from the late 1960s on. From sparse technical info and 
pictures, it appears to be actually built up from parts, into an 
interesting machine. I could not find any manuals (without signing up 
for some kind of subscription at document websites) or detailed info.


Ed

___
volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [volt-nuts] Vibrating reed electrometers

2018-03-06 Thread ed breya
Another thing I noticed in these instruments - the highest R value used 
is E12, even though decades higher would have been appropriate in 
certain ranges. It shows that was about the practical limit for somewhat 
decent precision and cost. Filling in the desired higher ranges had to 
be done by adding complexity like more gain elsewhere, and writing the 
specs accordingly.


Ed

___
volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [volt-nuts] Vibrating reed electrometers

2018-03-06 Thread ed breya
Yup - Keithley 640 - that must be the one. This stirred my memory 
somewhat, and I just located info on the model 642 also, which was 
apparently newer. The 642 went to (or back to) ultra-low bias MOSFETs, 
while keeping sapphire insulation and a separate input head. The MOSFETs 
need all kinds of offset, temperature, and bias current compensation. 
The 642 also uses a few digits of DVM that obscure the real 
capabilities, as I mentioned previously. The specs apparently show the 
most sensitive range as 1 pA FS, so all stuff below E-12 A depends on 
those digits to resolve. The manual recommends that extremely small 
currents below 1 fA (the third digit down) be measured in charge mode. I 
think this is to compensate for bias current and to average out some of 
the 1/f noise.


The 640 on the other hand, can apparently reach 1 fA FS (1000x lower) 
with 100 aA p-p (+/- 5%) noise on analog readout. Given a choice between 
the two, I think I'd pick the 640, and hook a DVM to the output, and 
average a whole bunch if necessary. I think the 640 uses a superior 
front-end technology that maybe could be even further improved in the 
middle and back end, while the 642 probably is as good as it can ever be 
already.


Ed

___
volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [volt-nuts] Vibrating reed electrometers

2018-03-03 Thread Bruce Griffiths
The Keithley model 640 was a vibrating capacitor electrometer.

It was available in the 1970's.

Bruce

> 
> On 04 March 2018 at 06:34 george  wrote:
> 
> Hi all
> 
> To the best of my memory Keithley never made vibrating reed 
> electrometers, the only one that I am aware of is the Varian Cary 401 which 
> did use Sapphire insulators. I was the European product line specialist for 
> Varian Cary in the late 1960/1970 era and was involved with the 401.
> 
> George G6HIG
> 
> 
> From: volt-nuts  on behalf of 
> volt-nuts-requ...@febo.com 
> Sent: 03 March 2018 17:00
> To: volt-nuts@febo.com
> Subject: volt-nuts Digest, Vol 103, Issue 3
> 
> Send volt-nuts mailing list submissions to
> volt-nuts@febo.com
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 
> https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.febo.com%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fvolt-nuts&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cb5818846d36e4ecd914908d581283c52%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C636556932161076932&sdata=cp01qd%2FkRw4yYSLYOqJ8RwUF8oOxtdqLVOmDal7gBhs%3D&reserved=0
>  
> https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.febo.com%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fvolt-nuts&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cb5818846d36e4ecd914908d581283c52%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C636556932161076932&sdata=cp01qd%2FkRw4yYSLYOqJ8RwUF8oOxtdqLVOmDal7gBhs%3D&reserved=0
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> volt-nuts-requ...@febo.com
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> volt-nuts-ow...@febo.com
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of volt-nuts digest..."
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>1. Re: Precision high resistance measurements / calibration of
>   HP 4339B high-resistance meter. (ed breya)
>2. Re: Precision high resistance measurements / calibration of
>   HP 4339B high-resistance meter. (Mitch Van Ochten)
> 
> --
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2018 09:22:32 -0800
> From: ed breya 
> To: volt-nuts@febo.com
> Subject: Re: [volt-nuts] Precision high resistance measurements /
> calibration of HP 4339B high-resistance meter.
> Message-ID: <5f6e418c-649b-70e8-8502-facf1176f...@telight.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
> 
> Oops - I think I didn't send this message properly yesterday - here goes
> again. Ed
> 
> Yes, David, unless you go to very extreme measures, you won't see real R
> values that have any practical meaning beyond E12 ohms or so. Most
> practical insulation Rs may be around E12-E14 tops, unless you go to
> sapphire. Up in that region, the R may be all within a material, or
> include surface components like a film of dirt or moisture, or a
> fingerprint.
> 
> E11 resistors can be made to fairly high precision, and maybe E12
> nowadays. In the old days, higher values were made by stacking E11s -
> like ten in series to get E12 with decent precision. The glass packaging
> also limits how high it can go, due to leakage within and on the
> surface. I once used a glass reed relay capsule as an ultra-high
> resistance in a circuit. There was no precision or stability at all, but
> it made a nice high resistor (probably E14-ish dry) even though there
> was no element in there, and the circuit didn't care, as long as it was
> very high, but not infinite.
> 
> The specs on this HP unit are likely just the most extreme capability
> taking maximum voltage over minimum current resolution, but any
> measurements would tend to be very noisy and unstable anyway. Also,
> testing at the extreme 1 kV makes the numbers seem more impressive, but
> the voltage coefficient of resistance will pretty much be unpredictable.
> 
> If this is a digital meter, then the other spec trick that tends to
> obscure the real performance limit is that the ultimate resolution and
> noise is that last digit - or even last two or three - that may may be
> pretty jumpy, unless very long averaging time is used.
> 
> There may be newer, fancier electrometers nowadays, but Keithley used to
> be the standard for these in the old days, before several digits of DVM
> resolution complicated the specs. They had a vibrating capacitor
> electrometer with all-sapphire input structure back in the 1970s/80s I
> think, that was the epitome of electrometers. I forget the model number,
> but vaguely recall that it could reach the aA region full scale - not
> that last digit of resolution thing. It's long obsolete, and I don't
> think they ever made anything actually better - only added DVM digits to
> less capable, conventional semiconduc