Iterative hierarchical strain and the atom.

2004-08-17 Thread Grimer
Vortexians might be interested to hear that whilst working up background information on this topic one of the first references I came across was Lewis's paper on www.lenr-canr.org/. It just shows that information on LENR must be getting around if I can stumble upon it quite accidently whilst

Re: Iterative hierarchical strain and the atom.

2004-08-17 Thread thomas malloy
Grimer poasted Science is finished syndrome, There is nothing more to discover. It is the Benjamin Jowett attitude.. === Here I come, my name is Jowett All there is to know, I know it What I don't know, is not knowledge I am the Master

Re: Iterative hierarchical strain and the atom.

2004-08-17 Thread RC Macaulay
A University had a parallel computing project underway some 10 or more years ago. The idea of assembling four computers into a quadratic computing system did not escape a few grad students that wanted to take parallel to quad. Their thought was to use quadratic computing for the advancement of

Re: Iterative hierarchical strain and the atom.

2004-08-17 Thread Standing Bear
On Tuesday 17 August 2004 11:30, thomas malloy wrote: Grimer poasted Science is finished syndrome, There is nothing more to discover. It is the Benjamin Jowett attitude.. === Here I come, my name is Jowett All there is to know, I know

OFF TOPIC SUV safety gap

2004-08-17 Thread Jed Rothwell
See: http://www.nytimes.com/2004/08/17/business/17auto.html?hp Safety Gap Grows Wider Between S.U.V.'s and Cars Summary: Death rate for various vehicle types, per 1 billion miles traveled: Minivans, 2.76 Large passenger cars and station wagons, averaging about 3,600 pounds unloaded, 3.3 The

Re: New light on LENR

2004-08-17 Thread Jed Rothwell
Jones Beene writes: It is a truly impressive claim. An apparent, repeatable, replicated, *on-demand* attainment of a COP of ~17 and greater. A little too impressive. I would like to know more about the calorimetry. I would be willing to bet that a number of other labs, perhaps a large number

Re: Sci. Am. attacks Infinite Energy

2004-08-17 Thread Jed Rothwell
Standing Bear writes: That is not as bad as the Popular Science piece of yellow journalism. Their latest issue treated cold fusion as 'terrorism'. First they want to be implacable hyperskeptics . . . No, they were not. Popular Science has actually been quite reasonable and informative

Re: Sci. Am. attacks Infinite Energy

2004-08-17 Thread Standing Bear
On Tuesday 17 August 2004 15:48, Jed Rothwell wrote: Standing Bear writes: That is not as bad as the Popular Science piece of yellow journalism. Their latest issue treated cold fusion as 'terrorism'. First they want to be implacable hyperskeptics . . . No, they were not.