At 4:55 PM 11/26/4, Jones Beene wrote:
--- Horace Heffner wrote:
The good news is that *gaps* between superconductors
can be used to generate radiation by imposing a
potential across the gap. Unfortunately, the gap must
be small enough that electrons can tunnel back and
forth...
Thanks for
From: What's New [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Akira Kawasaki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 11/26/2004 3:42:42 PM
Subject: WHAT'S NEW Friday, 26 Nov 04 Washington, DC
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 26 Nov 04 Washington, DC
1. EMPTY SPACE: IS MOON-MARS A JUST A TASTE OF WHAT WE'RE IN FOR?
Hi All.
Jones writes:
Well, we should all be aware that LENR is SO very
diverse and often self-contradictory in the details
that there is a body of literature that favors both
sides of almost every relevant issue, this one
included.
Excellent point. For about as many papers on the LENR site
At 2:54 PM 11/27/4, Keith Nagel wrote:
[snip]
...For about as many papers on the LENR site
point towards a surface effect rather than a bulk effect.
It's quite possible both exist; the truth is the current
data is sketchy and incomplete.
[snip]
Horace writes:
There is a huge body of literature
What gets hotter - the cold turkey (10 degrees K)
which is put into the freezer... or the identical
turkey put into the microwave oven?
A no-brainer unless we qualify the question to add...
IF each turkey gets the same number of characteristic
photons from its appliance? Assume the
Horace Heffner writes:
My objection was to the concept that it is an interface effect, that
overcoming the interface potential drop obtains CF. (Actually, if the
interface potential drop can be defeated then 2nd law violation might be
achieved however, and handy free energy hydrogen
At 2:59 PM 11/27/4, Frederick Sparber wrote:
I would certainly hope that CF/OU reactions across/at an interface (Double
Layer) violates the 2nd law.
But that is the issue at hand ... is the interface an essential part of
LENR or only there because of the choice of electrolysis as the means of
Horace Heffner wrote:
At 2:59 PM 11/27/4, Frederick Sparber wrote:
I would certainly hope that CF/OU reactions across/at an interface
(Double
Layer) violates the 2nd law.
Also, a sacrificial anode may avoid the use of
batteries to drive portable electrolysis, but may also mess up the
Hi,
This is my first post.
I was wondering if anyone in CF community has looked for evidence of a
correlation between the orientation of a CF cell and the amount of excess
heat produced.
Perhaps the performance of a CF cell would change if the cell or some of its
parts were rotated 90 degrees
At 8:34 PM 11/27/4, Frederick Sparber wrote:
Horace Heffner wrote:
At 2:59 PM 11/27/4, Frederick Sparber wrote:
I would certainly hope that CF/OU reactions across/at an interface
(Double
Layer) violates the 2nd law.
Also, a sacrificial anode may avoid the use of
batteries to drive
Excuse me! That is Mitchell Swartz who posts here sometimes and is publiher
of COLD FUSION TIMES and who has published on the existence of
*calorimetric anomalies* relating to gravity.
Regards,
Horace Heffner
An alternative approach to sustaining loading, once achieved, might be to
substitute a low conductivity electrolyte and drive the electrolysis at
high voltage and very low current.
Regards,
Horace Heffner
12 matches
Mail list logo
