Re: Gravity Oscillating Charge

2004-12-12 Thread Frederick Sparber
Horace Heffner wrote: Jefimenko demonstrates that B, and thus K, are merely computed quantities, secondary quantities that necessarily follow from the only true causes, the interaction of charge upon charge or mass upon mass. This provides strong evidence for the "real" existence of K, as

Re: Gravity Oscillating Charge

2004-12-12 Thread Horace Heffner
At 6:01 AM 12/12/4, Frederick Sparber wrote: The Trapped Photon Energy Loops or Disks that make up a particle (quark or electron inertial mass) oscillates at 1.0e25 Hz for the quark, and 1.7e22 Hz for the electron-positron. Do you have a reference on this? Regards, Horace Heffner

unsubscribe

2004-12-12 Thread Harry Veeder

subscribe

2004-12-12 Thread Harry Veeder

Re: Gravity Oscillating Charge

2004-12-12 Thread Frederick Sparber
It is derived simply by: c/2(pi)R Where R = kq^2/E David Bergman and cohorts have a similar model (later), but, we are at odds on several points. http://www.commonsensescience.org. Frederick [Original Message] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Horace Heffner) To: vortex-l [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date:

Re: Gravity Oscillating Charge

2004-12-12 Thread FZNIDARSIC
In a message dated 12/12/2004 1:22:48 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The "Trapped Photon Energy Loops or Disks" that make up a particle (quark or electron inertial mass) oscillates at 1.0e25 Hz for the quark, and 1.7e22 Hz for the electron-positron. Don't forget the

OT : Gravity Oscillating Charge

2004-12-12 Thread Jones Beene
Frank Z writes, Don't forget the Compton frequency of the electron. It is close to the numbers you mention. http://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/zpt/chaptera.html Nice start to this chapter, Frank. I have taken the liberty of rewording it slightly and adding a few short ;-) comments (after all,

Re: Corrections! was Re: Superluminal...

2004-12-12 Thread Harry Veeder
Horace Heffner at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 5:48 PM 12/10/4, Harry Veeder wrote: Thank you for responding to my revised post. Synchronisation is done beforehand. e.g. Synchronise two clocks at the sender's location. Then move one of the clocks to the receiver's location. Atomic

off topic: HD flat screen television

2004-12-12 Thread FZNIDARSIC
I been looking at flat screen HD TVs for a while. The prices are coming down. Perhaps they will come down to the point where I can afford one in the next few years. I am perplexed. I have a first class FCC license and am thoroughly versed on standard TV. I see flat screen TV with 1040 and 480

Re: BEC Three Helium Fusion

2004-12-12 Thread Frederick Sparber
Jones. The classical repulsive coulomb barrier force equation F = Z1*Z2 * kq^2/R^2 doesn't take into account the magnetic strong force associated with the number of quarks in a given nucleus. For instance when two protons with three quarks (loops or disks)each with a magnetic field of

www.d2fusuion.com

2004-12-12 Thread Akira Kawasaki
Title: Message December 12, 2004 Vortex, After a long absence, I received this message from Russ George: He also attended the ICCF-11. Check out my revised web page for more. www.d2fusion.com Following the DoE report,Russ is getting numerous contacts from inquiring venture capitalists. Well,

Re: Gravity Oscillating Charge

2004-12-12 Thread Frederick Sparber
For the adventurous the dilated quark frequency is about 3.1 MegaHz and the dilated electron frequency is 8.5 Hz. Easy to cob up a current loop "Oscillating Hertzian Dipole" for these frequencies to see if they attract or repel the earth. Or make a pair of them to see how much "gravity-like

Fwd: Gravity Oscillating Charge

2004-12-12 Thread FZNIDARSIC
---BeginMessage--- In a message dated 12/12/2004 3:20:22 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The "Trapped Photon Energy Loops or Disks" that make up a particle (quark or electron inertial mass) I did a similar analysis. No one including IE would publish it.

Re: off topic: HD flat screen television

2004-12-12 Thread Hoyt A. Stearns Jr.
>From what I've seen Texas Instruments DLP (tiny movable mirrors) projectors are the best bet. The UHP mercury lamps are expensive, though ($400, ultra high pressure mercury arc lamps from Philips). The plasma displays I've seen had severe screen burn-in problems, and the dot pitch was quite

Re: BEC Three Helium Fusion

2004-12-12 Thread Jones Beene
Frederick Sparber writes, OTOH, for two deuterons the (repulsive charge)/(n*quark-magnetic force) ratio is 2*Z/14 not counting the antineutrino in each. How would this work for three BEC helium nuclei with 3*Z/42? :-) Well, Fred, they look pretty doggone close, don't they? What you seem