Vorts:
It is a pleasure to announce that the 2005 COLD FUSION Colloquium at
MIT, Cambridge Massachusetts
is now expanded from 9AM to (at least) 5 PM with the addition of several
new speakers,
including MIT Prof. Robert Rines who will lead the discussion on the Patent
Offices' response
to
Thought this might be of interest to the group,
http://www.ornl.gov/info/press_releases/get_press_release.cfm?ReleaseNumber=mr20050419-00
OAK RIDGE, Tenn., April 19, 2005 Zhiyu Hu believes
it is possible to match nature's highly efficient method
to convert chemicals into thermal energy at room
K,
Call me dense this morning, but don't get the implications of this
work.
All that seems to have been accomplished is to dispense with the
need of a spark. Is that so earth-shaking?
Jones
--- On Wed 04/20, Keith Nagel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thought this might be of interest to the group,
OAK RIDGE, Tenn., April 19, 2005 Zhiyu Hu believes
it is possible to match nature's highly efficient method
to convert chemicals into thermal energy at room temperature,
and he
I wrote:
And in terms of any advantages over plain old combustion, Jed,
this could lead to a low-temp fuel cell. Also, for uses where
high temperatures are not required the lack of a flame would
substantially reduce or eliminate NOx.
Oops, I meant Jones. Sorry.
M.
- Original Message -
From: Michael Foster
And in terms of any advantages over plain old combustion,
this could lead to a low-temp fuel cell.
PEM fuel cells are already low temp ~150 degrees
Also, for uses where
high temperatures are not required the lack of a flame would
substantially
I have long suspected there must a conspiracy along these lines.
Yes, there really is a National Association, but oddly enough Microsoft is not
a member. See:
http://www.naidonline.org/index.html
- Jed
7 matches
Mail list logo
