[Vo]:

2006-09-27 Thread Esa Ruoho
Looked through the Webster's Unabridged Encyclopedic Dictionary of the English Language.Apparently, Centrifugal force is center-fleeing.The opposite of Center is, apparently, Edge.Centripetal Force is the opposite of Centrifugal force, therefore Centripetal Force is Edge-fleeing

[VO]: Re: Esa Rucho

2006-09-27 Thread RC Macaulay
Esa wrote.. I really hope this email isn't taken as 1) troll 2) annoyance I would love to pose some more questions, I am starving of information, and tired of the "quick fix" people Howdy Esa, A lenghty discourse from you. Thanks!. Ask your specific questions, thats what Vorts is all about.

Re: [Vo]: Jed's Edict

2006-09-27 Thread thomas malloy
Mike Carrell wrote: - Original Message - From: Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Vo]: Aquaculture for energy Jones Beene wrote: Make no small plans, sez me. This would also drastically reduce CO2 emissions, which NASA and the Japanese press have headlined today. -

Re: [Vo]: Jed's Edict

2006-09-27 Thread Jed Rothwell
Let us put this in perspective. On Sept. 11, 2006, Bush said: The war against this enemy is more than a military conflict. It is the decisive ideological struggle of the 21st century, and the calling of our generation. I do not agree with that statement, but if I were president and I

Re: [Vo]: Jed's Edict

2006-09-27 Thread Jed Rothwell
thomas malloy wrote: keep coming back to our being able to run the country on the biodiesel produced on 61,000 square miles of algae ponds in the deserts. I recall that ~10,000 square miles of solar thermal generators could supply all of the energy in the U.S., not just liquid fuel. I will

[Vo]: questions about Schauberger technology

2006-09-27 Thread thomas malloy
Esa Ruoho wrote: I am starving of information, and tired of the quick fix people who just want another article on c()nspiracy, ufo, alien, nazi, ww2 intrigue. Please, from the bottom of my heart, please help. What's your agenda Esa? I corresponded with a man who has authored quite a

Re: [Vo]:

2006-09-27 Thread Terry Blanton
On 9/27/06, Esa Ruoho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: would you guys be able to explain why exactly does the egg start spinning around its own axis, and then rise, because of the vortical movement caused by spinning a spoon at the top? I believe this is caused by the effect named after Henri Marie

Re: [Vo]:

2006-09-27 Thread John Berry
Taking 'Vortex' more literally than most.Here is a question though, is a vortex just rotation of fluids, a fluid moving in a circle which in in effect a single dimension of movement.Or is it only when you have a fluid moving around, towards the center and down (or up?). (IMO that's a true vortex)

Re: [Vo]: Jed's Edict

2006-09-27 Thread Jed Rothwell
I wrote: The war against this enemy is more than a military conflict. It is the decisive ideological struggle of the 21st century, and the calling of our generation. I do not agree with that statement, but if I were president and I sincerely believed that, then I would consider closing down the

Re: [Vo]:

2006-09-27 Thread Robin van Spaandonk
In reply to John Berry's message of Thu, 28 Sep 2006 08:23:14 +1200: Hi, [snip] As for the egg I think it is lifted because of Bernoulli's law. On 9/28/06, Terry Blanton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/27/06, Esa Ruoho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: would you guys be able to explain why exactly

Re: [Vo]: stationary emdrive- inertial anchor

2006-09-27 Thread Robin van Spaandonk
In reply to Remi Cornwall's message of Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:04:36 +0100: Hi, [snip] Robin, Yes it is confusing. Also sometimes the phase velocity appears to be greater than c (anomalous media) or the group velocity is. In either case they defer to the one less than c. The Feynman articles give a

Re: [Vo]: Jed's Edict

2006-09-27 Thread Jeff and Dorothy Kooistra
Jed said: If this truly is a war, and we really want to win it, we should go all out, institute a draft, institute 90% income taxes and a $5 emergency gasoline tax, Why punish ourselves? If we really want to win as you put it, we simply stop worrying about civilian casualties in iraq and,

RE: [Vo]: questions about Schauberger technology

2006-09-27 Thread John . Rudiger
Thomas Esa, The name you are looking for is Frank Germano. He has a pretty amazing web site as well as the VS Group on Yahoo. See http://www.frank.germano.com/viktorschauberger.htm Frank's website has many other paths apart from VS including Tesla. Esa is already a member of the VS group on

RE: [Vo]: Jed's Edict

2006-09-27 Thread John Steck
Great idea! 1) how do you get the water there? 2) how do you keep it there? 3) how much cost effectiveness will be lost transporting it to where it can be used? There are reasons why it's desert 8^) -Original Message- From: thomas malloy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday,

[Vo]: Two interesting articles...

2006-09-27 Thread William Beaty
A selected history of expectation bias in physics.M. Jeng, Am. J. of Physics, July 2006 http://scitation.aip.org/journals/doc/AJPIAS-ft/vol_74/iss_7/578_1.html The beliefs of physics can bias their results toward their expectations in a number of ways. We survey a variety of

RE: [Vo]: questions about Schauberger technology

2006-09-27 Thread John Steck
I think this is the device you refer... http://www.hasslberger.com/tecno/tecno_2.htm Some links you may find interesting (if you haven't found them already)... http://freeenergynews.com/Directory/AetherWave/ImplosionTurbine/index.html http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/repulsin.htm

Re: [Vo]: stationary emdrive- inertial anchor

2006-09-27 Thread Robin van Spaandonk
In reply to Keith Nagel's message of Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:50:18 -0400: Hi Keith, [snip] Hi Robin, I was confused by this also. I don't think english is Andres first language, so his paper is a little obtuse at points. What he's saying, after a more careful read on my part, is that he assumes The

Re: [Vo]: stationary emdrive- inertial anchor

2006-09-27 Thread Colin Quinney
Keith, Drop Roger Shawyer for a second. Have you seen Steve Burn's recent paper? He suggests that to increase gravitational mass we reduce the phase velocity. I thought I was confused before. (Phase velocity. Group velocity. FTL / No FTL.) http://www.geocities.com/sburns808/SWMass.pdf