[Vo]: Easy Unidirectional Force, get out your calculators...

2007-01-28 Thread John Berry
Ok, here is a challenge, please calculate the unidirectional force that would be created by having a 2x1 inch cube neodymium magnets (1 Tesla) separated by 2 inches in attraction. Vertically aligned Now assume that gravity is equivalent to acceleration: ^ 1 G of virtual acceleration up. (hence

Re: [Vo]: Energy *Violations* using *standard* physics

2007-01-28 Thread Michel Jullian
Indeed you're right there are several universes, the one that works as you believe, plus the real one lol :) Energy stored in a pure inductor is fully recoverable actually, as you would know if you had done any switchmode power converter design. Again, reactance stores energy, resistance

[Vo]: 1.6mhz and similar interest

2007-01-28 Thread Stiffler Scientific
Many of you may have seen this posting, I'm sure Jones staff did :-), its far to similar to 'Circuit Cries Foul'. except that it has no electrical driving force. On some group I posted my thought that because of the physical size of the capacitors that the frequency of resonance must be in the low

Re: [Vo]: Re: Jones hypothesis on circuit

2007-01-28 Thread Terry Blanton
On 1/27/07, Robin van Spaandonk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is it possible that you are picking up stray radiation from e.g. your palmtop, or other digital equipment (scope perhaps?). No, more likely: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extended_AM_broadcast_band Terry

RE: [Vo]: Re: Jones hypothesis on circuit

2007-01-28 Thread Stiffler Scientific
Terry, Is it possible that you are picking up stray radiation from e.g. your palmtop, or other digital equipment (scope perhaps?). Nice thought, but run the calculations and you will see the required field strength/meter for me to extract this type of energy. Also if you have not, look at

Re: [Vo]: Energy *Violations* using *standard* physics

2007-01-28 Thread Stephen A. Lawrence
You folks are mostly arguing definitions at this point IMHO and I don't want to get involved in that. However, there's something here that bugs me whenever I think about this stuff. Michel Jullian wrote: Energy stored in a pure inductor is fully recoverable actually Yes, of course, v = -L

[Vo]: Re: 1.6mhz and similar interest

2007-01-28 Thread Jones Beene
Stiffler Scientific wrote: This circuit was dismissed as a well modeled fake(?), Now if it indeed is or was a fake the perpetrators took some time and went to some effort to be labeled fools. http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Resonant_Nuclear_Reactor This is indeed a fabulous effort

Re: [Vo]: Re: 1.6mhz and similar interest

2007-01-28 Thread Terry Blanton
On 1/28/07, Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And finally - so as to appease cat-lovers and PETA activists alike, the skin a cat idiom is not to be taken literally: I took it quite literally after our Maine Coon Cat broke my wife's favorite serving dish. I found him on the kitchen island

[Vo]: Waveform Circuit Cries Foul

2007-01-28 Thread Stiffler Scientific
Okay already, for the people that are giving me the bad name (again), here is a wave form. Now I have labeled certain points, the rest is up to you that can tell, where it is taking place, (not why, but where). www.stifflerscientific.com/images/avtrig4.jpg

RE: [Vo]: Waveform Circuit Cries Foul

2007-01-28 Thread Stiffler Scientific
No the pulse is not on the gate, the following pulls the display so you can see clearly. www.stifflerscientific.com/images/avtrig5.jpg -Original Message- From: Stiffler Scientific [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2007 9:51 AM To: Vortex Subject: [Vo]: Waveform

[Vo]: Side Note: Extended AM band

2007-01-28 Thread Jones Beene
Terry Blanton wrote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extended_AM_broadcast_band If it does turn out, in this thread, that the mundane rules over the exotic - as is usually the case admittedly ... and that this particular anomaly is related to what could be - not only an ultra-efficient

RE: [Vo]: Re: 1.6mhz and similar interest

2007-01-28 Thread Steven Vincent Johnson
Terry sez: And finally - so as to appease cat-lovers and PETA activists alike, the skin a cat idiom is not to be taken literally: I took it quite literally after our Maine Coon Cat broke my wife's favorite serving dish. I found him on the kitchen island peering down at the broken dish

Re: [Vo]: Energy *Violations* using *standard* physics

2007-01-28 Thread Paul
Michel Jullian wrote: Indeed you're right there are several universes, the one that works as you believe, plus the real one lol :) According to MWI all universes are real. :-) I read of a poll that revealed most top physicists believe in MWI, including Stephen Hawking. Energy stored

Re: [Vo]: Energy *Violations* using *standard* physics

2007-01-28 Thread Paul
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote: [snip] However, there's something here that bugs me whenever I think about this stuff. Michel Jullian wrote: Energy stored in a pure inductor is fully recoverable actually Yes, of course, v = -L dI/dt and what goes in must come out. But as someone

[Vo]: [OT]: Of Cats 'n Dogs

2007-01-28 Thread Terry Blanton
On 1/28/07, Steven Vincent Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In my experience cats tend to be more pragmatic about such mundane matters. I'm not sure 'pragmatism' is the right term: As seen in a dog's diary: 7 am - Oh boy! A walk! My favourite! 8 am - Oh boy! Dog food! My favourite! 9 am -

Re: [Vo]: Re: 1.6mhz and similar interest

2007-01-28 Thread Harry Veeder
Steven Vincent Johnson wrote: Terry sez: And finally - so as to appease cat-lovers and PETA activists alike, the skin a cat idiom is not to be taken literally: I took it quite literally after our Maine Coon Cat broke my wife's favorite serving dish. I found him on the kitchen island

Re: [Vo]: Energy *Violations* using *standard* physics

2007-01-28 Thread Michel Jullian
I agree with all the interesting comments below, both Stephen's and yours, relative to the unavoidable antenna aspect of a coil, which makes it non purely inductive to some extent when current varies with time. However, may I remind you that my initial statement, which you deemed 100%

[Vo]: Re: Waveform Circuit Cries Foul

2007-01-28 Thread RC Macaulay
R Stiffler wrote.. Okay already, for the people that are giving me the bad name (again), here is a wave form. Now I have labeled certain points, the rest is up to you that can tell, where it is taking place, (not why, but where). www.stifflerscientific.com/images/avtrig4.j Howdy Ron,

Re: [Vo]: Energy *Violations* using *standard* physics

2007-01-28 Thread Paul
Michel Jullian wrote: I agree with all the interesting comments below, both Stephen's and yours, relative to the unavoidable antenna aspect of a coil, which makes it non purely inductive to some extent when current varies with time. However, may I remind you that my initial statement,

Re: [Vo]: Energy *Violations* using *standard* physics

2007-01-28 Thread Michel Jullian
Your new experiment (attraction rather than alignment) simplifies things somehow (no torque, just linear acceleration), but let's stick to the non-wire-resistive loop shall we, it makes things simpler, and closer to the electron orbit or spin counterpart you are comparing it to. 1/ Using an