A poll of 72 leading physicists conducted by the American researcher David Raub
in 1995 and published in the French periodical Sciences et Avenir in January
1998 recorded that nearly 60% thought many worlds interpretation was 'true'.
Paul Lowrance
Paul wrote:
A poll of 72 leading physicists conducted by the American researcher
David Raub in 1995 and published in the French periodical Sciences et
Avenir in January 1998 recorded that nearly 60% thought many worlds
interpretation was 'true'.
Despite true being a loaded-word, if there
Or as Hui Neng said: From the first, there is nothing.
P.
At 11:37 AM 2/25/2007, you wrote:
Paul wrote:
A poll of 72 leading physicists conducted by the American
researcher David Raub in 1995 and published in the French
periodical Sciences et Avenir in January 1998 recorded that nearly
Looked at Alexandr Frolov's site. The magnetic free energy extractor appears
for sale to be built in the 'Emirates, Bulgaria, and Slovakiawhy not in
Russia and give some St Petersburgensians a good job? His site claims 400
percent efficiency, and there is quite a list of available
Gnorts Vorts!
While some things must remain on the QT, I was reading that TB
(Bearden, not me) claims that his MEG gets cool when it's pumping
power. Would any Vorts care to speculate how an OU device would take
heat from the environment?
Terry
On Friday 23 February 2007 09:59, Zell, Chris wrote:
I realize that completely eliminating all contamination is difficult but
if protons can be popped out of the vacuum by an arc discharge, then I
think we need
to take another look at the Steady State theory of the universe. This
could be
I wrote:
...
If the thrust can be increased by increasing the gap distance, how large can
the gap be made?
As large as you wish, but if you increase the gap you must also e.g. increase
the voltage and the wire-to-wire spacing, the parameters are interdependent
so
you must calculate them
Blast-from-the past (9 years ago): and shall we dare to revisit
everyone's (especially Jed's) favorite pseud-o-U Claimant: (Joe N, not
Jean L N)
http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/NMac0709.htm
JLN sez: The purpose of this test is to check for changes in the
entropy of the (Newman) Machine
Side
Michel Jullian wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Harry Veeder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 8:04 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Lifters
...
...Sigmond's derivation for the lifter thrust (or rather it's opposite
namely the force
exerted
On 2/25/07, Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...or whatever (after all JNL's lab is on the premises of EDF) ...and
also that if not an antenna, then the temperature drop, small as it was,
was proof of negentropy - and very likely to have been related to ZPE
extraction.
Yes, this is where
On 2/25/07, Terry Blanton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/25/07, Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...or whatever (after all JNL's lab is on the premises of EDF) ...and
also that if not an antenna, then the temperature drop, small as it was,
was proof of negentropy - and very likely to have
On 2/25/07, Terry Blanton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, this is where I was heading. If one can extract from Dirac's sea
of negative energy, you must provide the heat of evaporation. Could
the electron's magnet moment be just the sort of pump required?
My fingers are not completely
- Original Message -
From: Harry Veeder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2007 9:15 PM
Subject: [Vo]: ions and air
...
I reread this and now I find something else perplexing.
How do the ions manage to make their way to the lower electrode
if
Before sending along the 600 million Euros, I would Google up:
Frolov fraud
just in case.
Michel
- Original Message -
From: Standing Bear [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2007 7:33 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Frolov update AKOIL claims 400% eff
Looked
Michel Jullian wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Harry Veeder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2007 9:15 PM
Subject: [Vo]: ions and air
...
I reread this and now I find something else perplexing.
How do the ions manage to make their
Imagine a lifter is hanging from a thread without
any power. Immediately after the thread is cut the power
is turned on.
Would you get a different value for the force on the ions
if you did the calculation from the beginning in an
accelerating frame of reference?
Harry
Doing calculations in an accelerating frame makes me sick I am afraid ;-) But I
guess it would be the same force, since it's not a ficticious one like e.g. the
centrifugal force.
My turn to give you some homework Harry, could you try the new multiwire-plane
design guide I posted earlier today
In reply to Michel Jullian's message of Mon, 26 Feb 2007 00:27:04 +0100:
Hi Michel,
[snip]
Doing calculations in an accelerating frame makes me sick I am afraid ;-) But
I guess it would be the same force, since it's not a ficticious one like e.g.
the centrifugal force.
My turn to give you some
18 matches
Mail list logo
