The headline in my newspaper of Saturday Feb. 3, 2007 said, “GLOBAL WARNING-
If nothing is done to combat greenhouse gases, extreme weather could kill 1
million people by 2100…
I am greatly concerned about the “global warming hysteria” that is being
foisted upon the public. I recall a news
It is already far warmer that it has been for an extremely long time, not
500 years.
I can't be bothered reading the rest of your ignorant post but if you don't
realize that the weather is warming up your a fool/idiot.
That warming 500-1000 years ago is a blip compared to this.
On 4/22/07, Jeff
On 4/22/07, thomas malloy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jones Beene wrote:
Enjoy you(r) rapturous stay in the
NeoCon wing of the Matrix
Kokopelli rules ;-)
What does that mean?
The trickster rules:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kokopelli
Terry (wishing he had a detachable penis)
I don't see the logic in a lot of your words. You assume that because the Sun is
part of the cause that humanity has somehow done nothing. That's not true. What
you said is well known and is openly discussed amongst climate scientists,
including Dr. Brenda.
Sorry, I'll side with the mass
On 4/23/07, Kyle R. Mcallister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That warming 500-1000 years ago is a blip compared to this.
Numbers to support this please.
--Kyle
Watch An Inconvenient Truth, there is a chart that addresses this.
The warming 500 - 1000 years ago is a blip compared to what, exactly?
P.
- Original Message
From: John Berry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2007 10:10:34 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Global Warning
On 4/23/07, Kyle R. Mcallister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff Fink wrote:
It means that 500 years ago it was warmer, and
that human activity had nothing to do with it! It is well known to some
historians that the period from 900 to 1100 AD was also warmer than today by
about three degrees, and human activity had nothing to do with that either!
I
On 4/23/07, R.C.Macaulay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now speaking of mammoths being frozen in Siberia.. shucks , we have
politicians in office in Texas... well.. err.. nevermind.. you wouldn't
believe it.
Richard
I hate a mystery, finish your thought.
http://journal.copernicus.org/en/images/stories/film_reviews/ice_age2/ipcc_temp_past1000years2.jpghotter
than the last 1,000 years
http://www.grida.no/climate/vital/graphics/large/2.jpg co2 and temperature
linked
http://cosmicvariance.com/wp-images/CO2.png CO2 waaay up
You can't rule out data
Not only that, but Jeff didn't deny that global warming wasn't happening
(although that in itself is questionable - if we're allowed to question the
sacred GW Scriptures); he was simply saying that the evidence (evidence, mind
you) is that global warming has happened before and will happen
Richard, I bet you were going to tell us that the green stuff in their mouths
isn't tropical vegetation...
P.
- Original Message
From: R.C.Macaulay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2007 10:14:16 AM
Subject: [VO]:Re: Global warming
Blank
BODY {
Evidence For Human-caused Global Warming Is Now 'Unequivocal'
February 2, 2007
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/02/070202085036.htm
Global effects:
http://www.greenandgoldenergy.com.au/images/EnergyUsage200Years.JPG
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/files/community/science_1.1.1.jpg
Jones Beene wrote:
Despite some recent assertions, the battery-electric
car, the plug-in Prius, so to speak - will not make
much of a dent in net carbon emissions without a huge
nuclear investment . . .
That is incorrect. There is a huge unused generating capacity at night -- more
than enough
BlankJohn Berry wrote..
It is already far warmer that it has been for an extremely long time, not 500
years.
I can't be bothered reading the rest of your ignorant post but if you don't
realize that the weather is warming up your a fool/idiot.
Howdy John,
You may propose a solution to your
- Original Message -
From: John Berry
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2007 8:01 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Global Warning
It is already far warmer that it has been for an extremely long time, not
500 years.
I can't be bothered reading the rest of your ignorant post but if
--- Jed Rothwell wrote:
That is incorrect. There is a huge unused generating
capacity at night -- more than enough to charge up
electric cars.
Capacity is not the problem. CO2 is still emitted at
night.
Furthermore, electric power generation and electric
cars are far much efficient than
Jones Beene wrote:
That is incorrect. There is a huge unused generating
capacity at night -- more than enough to charge up
electric cars.
Capacity is not the problem. CO2 is still emitted at
night.
But as I said, only half of the generators are coal. The others are gas which
is as much as
A google search for the most efficient production
diesel turns up many candidates overseas, but zero
made in the USA. Ours are typically larger V8 designs
of over 5 liters, used in trucks
Among the best is a 35 year old engine design. The
Peugeot 205 diesel (1.9 liter) of one respondent to a
Google as usual has a cool icon. Today's Earth day. See the attached image to
this post or just go to http://google.com today
Paul Lowrance
--- Jed Rothwell wrote:
The others are gas [natural gas] which is as much as
60% efficient
and can be built close to cities...
That number would only happen with co-genration, but -
OK - lets assume that it is just as accurate as the
estimate for the Crower 6-cycle.
Even so - when you send
Here is a concise description of the amount of solar radiation
received by the earth from the sun. These are figures most vorts
are probably familiar with.
http://home.iprimus.com.au/nielsens/solrad.html
A short quote from this site:
The energy intercepted by the Earth over a period of one
Jones Beene wrote:
The others are gas [natural gas] which is as much as
60% efficient
and can be built close to cities...
That number would only happen with co-genration . . .
That is combined cycle, not co-gen. With co-gen you can get 80% or 90%,
depending on the location and time of year.
--- Jed
On the contrary a small diesel in a hybrid
arrangment makes the most sense of all. A hybrid
improves diesel performance as much as any other
motor.
Exactamundo - no contrario ! You must have
misunderstood my intent (or more likely it was too
hastily posted) if you thought that this
Dear Vo.,
Can anyone let us know BBGB
(A) what is-are the battery pack in the Prius automobile???
(B)Watts...weight
(C) Electric motor... type. HP... weight???
(D) WILL anyone let us know the actual parameters ...for of... or
... with
The general ::
In reply to john herman's message of Sun, 22 Apr 2007 18:52:09 -0400:
Hi John,
[snip]
Dear Vo.,
Can anyone let us know BBGB
(A) what is-are the battery pack in the Prius automobile???
A five second web search on prius tech. specs yields:-
25 matches
Mail list logo
