2009/10/3, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax :
> One of the interesting SPAWAR
> results is IR imaging of the cathode, showing that the cathode
> temperature is substantially higher than that of the electrolyte.
I don't think this proves anything, I doubt IR imaging can distinguish
between temperature of the c
On Oct 3, 2009, at 9:18 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
At 01:52 AM 10/3/2009, Horace Heffner wrote:
I suggested a possible means to beat this co-location problem (and
thus cause fusion) here in 1996. It is described here:
http://mtaonline.net/~hheffner/BoseHyp.pdf
Once we have simple, chea
[snip] It will be much better (and clear) to talk about (radial) changes of
velocity (accelerations). There's no need also to talk about Lorentz
contraction, because that arises between reference frames, [end snip]
Mauro,
I think radial acceleration of H1 inside a cavity is relativistic
cr
* * * * * * * * STEM+IC=MIND'sHologram=Quantum-Infinity/Quantum-Mind * * * * *
* *
*STEM+IC Physics identifies a 'source-first-energy dimension' as
First-Mind/MIND+IC
*STEM+IC stands for 'Space Time Energy Mass plus Information-Computation as
Prime-Mind' as the physics source of simpl
At 02:22 PM 10/3/2009, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
> At 09:46 AM 10/3/2009, Horace Heffner wrote:
>> I don't think controlling thermal instabilities is important, it is
>> eliminating their effect on the calorimetry. This is of course why
>> Seebeck calorimetry is usefu
The Bae Institute in SoCal (Tustin) is a curious R&D center. Maybe
'laughable' is more apt, if you happen to be Bob Park or a mainstream fusion
guru from MIT.
It is named for Dr. Young K. Bae - and it does indeed do high-tech
experimental work - but is also advertised as a technical school in the
George Holz's message of Saturday, October 03, 2009 1:50 PM
[snip] Yes, it is reasonable to feel almost alone in considering non lattice
based cold fusion, but there are a few of us out there quietly considering
the relationship of Mills experiments to cold fusion experiments. It is
interesting
-best edit-
*Premise: The 'prime-energy-dimensional-density estate is MIND:' And this
MIND/first-energy-plateau renders the ALL and every manifestation of the
physics that we can detect 'and' the laws of physics that we cannot as yet
perceive. And as such this STEM+IC/MIND-FirstEnergy is
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
> At 09:46 AM 10/3/2009, Horace Heffner wrote:
>> I don't think controlling thermal instabilities is important, it is
>> eliminating their effect on the calorimetry. This is of course why
>> Seebeck calorimetry is useful. Whatever directions the heat flows,
>> it is me
Robin van Spaandonk's message of October 02, 2009 ,
Hi Robin and Jed,
Robin wrote:
>Let me give a concrete example. Muon catalyzed fusion clearly meets the
>definition of a Low Energy Nuclear Reaction, and hence papers on it could
find a
>place in your library, but I suspect you wouldn't even c
http://www.ijn.com/obituaries/obituaries/282-dr-nathan-hoffman
All=STEM+IC=MIND's Hologram=Energy's 1st-Estate//{STEM+IC=Space Time Energy
Mass+Information-Computation}
*Premise: The 'prime-energy-dimensional-density estate is MIND:' And this
MIND/first-energy plateau renders the ALL and every manifestation of the
physics that we can detect 'and' the
At 01:52 AM 10/3/2009, Horace Heffner wrote:
I suggested a possible means to beat this co-location problem (and
thus cause fusion) here in 1996. It is described here:
http://mtaonline.net/~hheffner/BoseHyp.pdf
Once we have simple, cheap, standard cells operating and available
and being produ
At 09:46 AM 10/3/2009, Horace Heffner wrote:
I don't think controlling thermal instabilities is important, it is
eliminating their effect on the calorimetry. This is of course why
Seebeck calorimetry is useful. Whatever directions the heat flows,
it is measured.
It occurs to me that, while the
At 08:20 AM 10/3/2009, Horace Heffner wrote:
Fairies, sprites, elves, pixies, leprechauns, or other magical beings
are hopefully not essential factors in cold fusion experiments.
Damn! I was hoping that living in Northampton, Massachusetts, and
having good relationships with the "alternative c
On Oct 3, 2009, at 4:28 AM, Dr. Mitchell Swartz wrote:
At 08:20 AM 10/3/2009, you wrote:
I wrote: "It strikes me as fairy easy to control for gravitational
thermal instabilities in flow calorimeters.".
That should be: "It strikes me as fairly easy to control for
gravitational thermal instabi
At 08:20 AM 10/3/2009, you wrote:
I wrote: "It strikes me as fairy easy to control for gravitational
thermal instabilities in flow calorimeters.".
That should be: "It strikes me as fairly easy to control for
gravitational thermal instabilities in flow calorimeters.".
Fairies, sprites, elves, p
I wrote: "It strikes me as fairy easy to control for gravitational
thermal instabilities in flow calorimeters.".
That should be: "It strikes me as fairly easy to control for
gravitational thermal instabilities in flow calorimeters.".
Fairies, sprites, elves, pixies, leprechauns, or other
On Oct 2, 2009, at 11:32 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
I wrote:
As far as I know, Swartz has never actually attempted to turn a
flow calorimeter cell sideways to see if the performance changes.
Cravens and I have actually tested this hypothesis by experiment.
We tried turning cells sideways.
19 matches
Mail list logo
