RE: [Vo]:Shanahan paper and Krivit's response

2010-05-08 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 04:06 PM 5/8/2010, Jones Beene wrote: -Original Message- From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax > This is what I expect to see: I'll be lucky if I register on the film one neutron track per several minutes, maybe ten minutes, averageThe key to the film is getting the film very close to the sou

RE: [Vo]:Shanahan paper and Krivit's response

2010-05-08 Thread Jones Beene
-Original Message- From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax > This is what I expect to see: I'll be lucky if I register on the film one neutron track per several minutes, maybe ten minutes, averageThe key to the film is getting the film very close to the source, so neutron levels on the level of o

Re: [Vo]:Surreal Russian Experiment

2010-05-08 Thread Jed Rothwell
Great photos. Thanks. They remind me of the photo collection someone posting here (I think it was) of the Chernobyl district. - Jed

Re: [Vo]:Shanahan paper and Krivit's response

2010-05-08 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 03:53 AM 5/8/2010, GeorgeBaldwin\(Gmail\) wrote: "We Americans are casual about such things.Hey, it sounds the same to us." Hey, I think I get it now, you mean like "fusion" and "fission"? :-) You mean that new-kew-lar stuff?

RE: [Vo]:Shanahan paper and Krivit's response

2010-05-08 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 07:06 PM 5/7/2010, Jones Beene wrote: -Original Message- From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax > But his [Scott Little] standing offer is to use his fancy calorimeter, and I'm not searching for heat. Just neutrons. Neutrons are direct evidence of nuclear reactions ... That is a good strategy, an

Re: [Vo]:Shanahan is proposing the cigarette lighter hypothesis

2010-05-08 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 08:42 AM 5/8/2010, Jed Rothwell wrote: Shanahan is proposing the oldest and least credible prosaic explanation for cold fusion: This is nonsense. See Fleischmann's response to Morrison about this, p. 10 and 11: http://lenr-canr.org/ac

Re: [Vo]:Shanahan is proposing the cigarette lighter hypothesis

2010-05-08 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 08:42 AM 5/8/2010, Jed Rothwell wrote: Shanahan is proposing the oldest and least credible prosaic explanation for cold fusion: "Once current stops, the driving force to load the Pd electrode with hydrogen is removed, and the system seeks to obtain equilibrium under the new state by releas

[Vo]:Shanahan is proposing the cigarette lighter hypothesis

2010-05-08 Thread Jed Rothwell
Shanahan is proposing the oldest and least credible prosaic explanation for cold fusion: "Once current stops, the driving force to load the Pd electrode with hydrogen is removed, and the system seeks to obtain equilibrium under the new state by releasing gas, converting the situation from an elect

Re: [Vo]:Shanahan paper and Krivit's response

2010-05-08 Thread GeorgeBaldwin(Gmail)
"We Americans are casual about such things.Hey, it sounds the same to us." Hey, I think I get it now, you mean like "fusion" and "fission"? :-) GB - Original Message - From: "Jed Rothwell" To: Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 11:44 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Shanahan paper and Krivit's