Jones, what is a Mac job?
iPoni sent dis message. Esa Ruoho wrote it.
On 8 Aug 2010, at 18:57, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
From: fznidar...@aol.com
the end of Mac-jobs, and the end of despair for middle class youth who have
no real future.
It was brought to my attention the apparent fact that a prominent critic of
R. Mills CQM theory, John Connett (aka Nora Baron - from the old Yahoo
Hydrino group) has recently apologized to Randy for criticizing certain
mathematical aspects of his CQM theory. I haven't found the direct source
but
I do not think I have EVER heard of a skeptic/critic ever change their mind
and apologize, for anything!
It's not even anything I ever expected to see.
What ever next?
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 1:52 AM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
orionwo...@charter.net wrote:
It was brought to my
John Berry wrote:
I do not think I have EVER heard of a skeptic/critic ever change
their mind and apologize, for anything!
Neither have I. It is remarkable.
- Jed
The original retraction from John Connett appears to be out at HSG
Hydrino Study Group Forum, maintained by Luke Setzer (my apologies for
misspelling Luke's last name):
http://forum.hydrino.org/viewtopic.php?f=5t=312sid=851e1815295c5d93648887358ed4869f
Luke replied:
I am locking and stickying
From: Esa Ruoho
. what is a Mac job?
This is my misspelled version of the entry-level service job in the USA
usually in food service: i.e. McDonalds.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McJob
From: John Berry
.Ok, I'm missing something here, how does having robotic factories give
In all fairness - has Randy ever apologized, or even lamely rationalized to
his few ardent supporters, his specific plan for a demonstration unit of the
gas phase (micro-turbine) device in six months? I am referring of course to
the infamous Art Rosenblum interview of 1997.
Seems to me that the
From Jones:
In all fairness - has Randy ever apologized, or even lamely rationalized to
his few ardent supporters, his specific plan for a demonstration unit of the
gas phase (micro-turbine) device in six months? I am referring of course to
the infamous Art Rosenblum interview of 1997.
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 12:03 PM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
svj.orionwo...@gmail.com wrote:
I, too, wait with baited breath for results long overdue, results
predicted to come from Mills Co.
They sold their first license to produce using BLP tech in Dec. 2008.
This year they began selling
I am still a fence sitter at HSG but just wish Mills would get the same
treatment as Arata-Zhang, Haisch-Moddel and other researchers in this field.
The Mills GUT may or may not be correct but it is obvious from results that he
is on a similar path to other researchers and certainly doesn't
From Fran:
I am still a fence sitter at HSG but just wish Mills would get the same
treatment as Arata-Zhang, Haisch-Moddel and other researchers in this field.
The Mills GUT may or may not be correct but it is obvious from results that
he is on a similar path to other researchers and
Jones Beene wrote:
Seems to me that the Mills' fanboys are due (long overdue) an apology after
13 years of waiting to see this demo, or at least at a minimum to know what
happened to delay it? ...
I do not know if an apology is called for. Anyone can be late with
fundamental research. But I
Since Monday seems to be 'dish on BLP' day on Vortex, let me add one curious
detail.
Seldom mentioned, but potentially glaring in the context of intellectual
property.
No matter how great the new BLP Reactor turns out to be when it finally
arrives - there is one fact that hardly anyone can
Jed, and Jones Beene once again demonstrate the perils of a failure to do
homework. Jed is forthright in his non-understanding of Mills' moves, and
Jones is stuck with a collection of long-ago forward-looking statements by
Mills as his work progressed. Jones has broad-based knowledge but he has
Jones Beene wrote:
Can anyone site any experiment done anywhere by
anyone comparing hydrogen with deuterium on a
lattice catalyst - where the hydrogen performed better?
I do not know if anyone ever tested Patterson's
beads with anything other than light water. I
will ask Cravens. But it
Jed, precisely what did Soejima do, and what did Mizuno replicate? Mills has
identified several catalytic, exothermic, hydrino-producing reactions
involving **only hydrogen**. The reactions are three-body, so that they are
significant only where there is a high density of H [or D] atoms. Such is
Mike Carrell wrote:
In my personal contacts with Mills I have seen no arrogance, just
confidence in his own insight. Criticism without the work of
understanding is itself 'arrogance'.
Oh come now, Mike. If you do not see arrogance in the attitudes
expressed by Mills, you need a refresher
Mike Carrell wrote:
Jed, precisely what did Soejima do, and what did Mizuno replicate?
It is described in considerable detail in Mizuno's papers and slides.
There are critical temperatures and so on, first described by
Soejima, and later confirmed by Mizuno. As far as I know the isotope
of
I asked Dennis Cravens (D2) if he recalls whether Patterson's beads worked
better with heavy water. My question and his response is below. I concur
with his belief that H is a poison in the gas loaded Pd system, and I would
say in the pure Pd electrolysis system as well.
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
Just so we are clear on this, EarthTech and others who showed no excess heat
with the CETI beads used DI water (distilled) but not heavy water. Miley got
positive results with D2O.
As Dennis says pure heavy water is essential with Pd, bulk or gas loading
nano-particles.
Therefore there is
Jones Beene wrote:
The new paradigm for a factory job, and there can be tens of millions of
this type of job - will be to own, maintain, and supervise a handful of
industrial robots 24/7. We can give every worker a personal stake in this by
forcing business to give equity stakes to workers
Jones Beene wrote:
The fact that H is a poison for D does not change that conclusion – in fact
it reinforces the conclusion, AFAIK?
Only for Pd as far as I know. Assuming the reported excess heat from Ti and
Ni is real, I have not heard that these work better with heavy hydrogen.
- Jed
BTW - having reread the EarthTech report, with the advantage of hindsight
-where they used DI water, we should remember (if I am not mistaken) that
this is made by passing water through ion exchange columns, one of which can
contain sodium hydroxide.
23 matches
Mail list logo
