In reply to OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson's message of Fri, 20 May 2011
07:24:55 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
From Robin:
[snip]
Is there anyone who believes Mills' hydrino theory who also understands
quantum mechanics?
Yes, Mills. :)
(Actually he's not the only one, there are probably quite
Very interesting article on energy policies, the energy of the
ether(ZPE), and more:
http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2011/05/14/nuclear-catastrophe-how-the-lack-of-fundamental-research-on-alternative-energy-led-to-a-wrong-energy-policy/
From Mauro:
Following the links:
http://www.angewandtebiologischeneuemedizin.com/en/index.php?title=Focardi-
Rossi_Energy-Catalyzer
Mostly Skeptical
However quite detailed. I'm impressed.
Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks
Hi,
On 21-5-2011 16:48, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
From Mauro:
Following the links:
http://www.angewandtebiologischeneuemedizin.com/en/index.php?title=Focardi-Rossi_Energy-Catalyzer
Mostly Skeptical
However quite detailed. I'm impressed.
Quote: and was transformed into the
*Dear Jed Rothwell: *
*
I am not going to give more information about this issue. Just can say we
have invented a process of ours to enrich Ni without relevant costs. To
elaborate Ni powders along classic processes is the invention of the hot
water. It is as invent and patent the sputtering in
This paper is pretty harsh.
http://iopscience.iop.org/1367-2630/7/1/127/pdf/njp5_1_127.pdf It's difficult
to imagine how the CQM advocates could have adequately addressed these
questions.
Sent from my iPhone.
On May 21, 2011, at 3:23, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to OrionWorks -
Awkshully, Mark - you covered the H+H situation too, back in Jan:
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg42057.html
but it bears repeating, since Dr Brown did comment directly to Rossi.
The important things which Julian misses IMHO - and which makes this
energetic reaction both
I've left that in my paper as a reliable link ... but it's not clear how to
join/ get editor rights.
(I saw several things that needed clarification/correction).
The linked blog also has competent (but skeptical) analysis .. in German, of
course. (Using which I can get to the train station,
This question was deleted. No answer.
Thon Brocket
May 20th, 2011 at 12:55 AM
Just for a little fun, Dr Rossi, would it be possible to cook something – boil
an egg or cook some pasta, perhaps – and video it? That would be a nice little
historical moment: “The first ever food cooked using
From Ron Kita:
I went to http://www.netsol.com
and noted that the E-Cat is hosted in Utah.
I am not sure if this is an official Rossi site
http://www.e-catworld.com
From appearances the site is very well done
Yes, it does seem to be reasonably organized. At first glance some of the
From Alan:
This question was deleted. No answer.
Thon Brocket
May 20th, 2011 at 12:55 AM
Just for a little fun, Dr Rossi, would it be possible to cook
something – boil an egg or cook some pasta, perhaps – and video
it? That would be a nice little historical moment: “The first
ever food
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 6:33 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
orionwo...@charter.net wrote:
Rats!
Squirrel!
http://eatocracy.cnn.com/2011/05/20/give-squirrel-a-whirl/
T
http://aleklett.wordpress.com/2011/05/16/the-sun-rossi%E2%80%99s-%E2%80%9Denergy-catalyzer%E2%80%9D-and-the-%E2%80%9Cneutron-barometer%E2%80%9D/#comments
The sun, Rossi’s ”energy catalyzer” and the “neutron barometer”
One hundred years ago the sun’s source of energy was a complete
An alternative translation of Rossispeak
http://www.talk-polywell.org/bb/viewtopic.php?t=2829postdays=0postorder=ascstart=1560sid=1bcf396d7381efeaaafd9b9d81c8e298
raphael : Here's what Rossi was attempting to say:
To assert that we are enriching Ni powders in the conventional manner would be
Original :
http://www.energikatalysatorn.se/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2t=57sid=8b0cab3864cf96c68a71692b63658e2c
GT:
Ekstrom: Crazy or not, you can sell a certain thing does not work. There have
been many times. Rossi's agenda is simply to generate interest and support from
those who believe in him or are too polite to tell the truth. Critics ignoring
him completely. Mats Lewan on New Technologies was an
Hi,
If Holmlid et al. are correct about the size of IRH, then it's production should
yield about 200 eV / atom just from shrinkage, i.e. even without any pursuant
nuclear reactions.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
At 08:08 PM 5/20/2011, you wrote:
The Pathological Skeptics / Reliable Source Police have been
attacking it line by line for several days.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Catalyzer
This morning they deleted the 18-hour test:
At 09:04 PM 5/20/2011, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
I hope this Wiki behavior is being meticulously documented, if for anything,
for posterity.
It's all in page history, Steven, unless Revision Deletion is used,
and that's not likely to happen to any serious extent.
Long
That explains why Ekstrom provided this link:
Cold fusion: A case study for scientific behavior
http://undsci.berkeley.edu/article/0_0_0/cold_fusion_01
This twelve page article uses a check-list of good scientific practice to
explain how Pons and Flieschman practiced bad science, while the
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 5:29 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
orionwo...@charter.net wrote:
Yes, it does seem to be reasonably organized. At first glance some of the
information even strikes me as being somewhat objective.
I would nevertheless be concerned about copy cats and
21 matches
Mail list logo
