I am looking for somebody to explain the higgs mechanism to me in simple
terms. It looks interesting and involves Bose- Einstein condensation,
vacuum energy and superconductivity, localization of electromagnetic field,
and linking of particles to the higgs field.
I am looking for something like "T
In reply to MarkI-ZeroPoint's message of Sat, 2 Mar 2013 08:19:12 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
>Not only heavily linked Robin, but heavy
increased mass
ergo, slow
ergo,
>W-L?
>
>-Mark
Just because something can't move, that doesn't necessarily mean that it is
heavier. A ping pong ball stuck in the cor
In reply to Mark Iverson's message of Sat, 2 Mar 2013 10:07:30 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
>"Nuclear Fusion in Five Years?"
>
>http://www.engineering.com/DesignerEdge/DesignerEdgeArticles/ArticleID/5388/
>Nuclear-Fusion-in-Five-Years.aspx?goback=%2Egde_78797_member_218795502
It's another form of hot fusion
The problem is, there are no young LENR workers.
- Jed
I have been thinking about expanding this paper about the Lewis CalTech
experiment, and putting it in the poster session at ICCF18:
"How Nature refused to re-examine the 1989 CalTech experiment"
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RothwellJhownaturer.pdf
1. Lewis write a good paper in many ways, and a
Erratum: Schwartz -> Schwarzschild
I guess it was one of God's little jokes to have the man who discovered the
radius of the black hole to be named Karl Schwarzschild.
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 4:25 PM, James Bowery wrote:
> Pierre Noyes' work on the combinatorial hierarchy aka bit-string physics
Pierre Noyes' work on the combinatorial hierarchy aka bit-string physics
actually appears to have a predicted radius for the proton derived from
pure mathematics. It is related to the Schwartz radius:
What this has led me to is an attempt to reformulate
quantization as resting on the
Axil,
Interesting finding.
Can youreward the associated source Nano letter, please?
Thanks!
Rob Woudenberg
Op donderdag 28 februari 2013 schreef Axil Axil (janap...@gmail.com) het
volgende:
> Hydrogen(H2) molecule dissociation to atomic hydrogen(H1)
>
>
> http://phys.org/news/2012-12-hot-elec
No, it isn't LENR, but it does use Deuterium as a fuel. and RF energy to
heat the fuel.
Small, simple (relatively speaking) and scalable. and commercial by 2025.
"Nuclear Fusion in Five Years?"
http://www.engineering.com/DesignerEdge/DesignerEdgeArticles/ArticleID/5388/
Nuclear-Fusion-in-Five
BTW - you can follow a relevant thread on this bit of alternative-energy
lore (Model-T magneto) here:
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/joecellfreeenergydevice/message/31101
. and yes - Henry Ford did make that infamous but misleading statement to
the oil barons .
. catch-22, he was r
Another footnote to the Model-T - but of questionable credibility.(unless D2
is holding back some info)
. was the lore that years ago, a nutty inventor took the "Vee magneto"
flywheel off a Model T Ford and developed it into a self-running
motor-generator. Doubt it, but if a nutty vortician wan
Hello all,
Many might have missed this recent study on brain transmission between
rats. As an old biologist, this is especially fascinating and certainly
will have future impact.
A summary at aln...@vicon-mail.com
Cheers, ken deboer
Whenever I come across something that relates to what some Vorts have an
interest in, I want to bring that info here in case it might help connect
some dots in someone's mind!
Yes, the article was talking radius, not mass which has been your point, but
aren't the two inextricably linked?
-m
Not only ‘heavily linked’ Robin, but heavy… increased mass… ergo, slow… ergo,
W-L?
-Mark
From: Roarty, Francis X [mailto:francis.x.roa...@lmco.com]
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 10:54 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Explaining Cold fusion -IV
There was a simula
Harry,
It sure seems they are saying that these results don't agree with QED, and
the experiments have been improved over the 3 yrs since first publication,
and they are still 7sigma away from what QED requires. Is this science
journalism being a bit overdramatic???
-mark
-Original Message--
From: Eric Walker
Quark mass does not have a value which can be agreed on, so
how can protons?
If I were a betting man, I would bet that the mass of a
proton can change, as well as that of a neutron. The reasoning goes like
this. An atomic nucleus
16 matches
Mail list logo
