Easter is coming up, he is in sync with the season.
Giovanni
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
Andrea Rossi
April 13th, 2013 at 3:41
PMhttp://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=802cpage=2#comment-676743
Dear Luca Salvarani:
1- I absolutely
I have been attempting to understand if or why there is a difference in the
behavior of high frequency photons as compared to those that we can easily
measure. One problem that crops up frequently is that the energy of these
waveforms travels outwards at the speed of light relative to us the
Caro Giovanni,
Cathlic Esater Sunday was March 31; this is a retarded
reaction from Rossi, he being an agile entrepreneur and
fast thinker. Non mi piace, including the rumors of testing
in Sweden- why just rumors?
Peter
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Giovanni Santostasi
Eric,
What if you decided to chase after one of the gamma rays? If you constructed a
spaceship that traveled at just below the speed of light relative to the source
of the ray, it would be effectively Doppler shifted indefinitely. What would
you measure at that point? I would suspect like
orthodox Easter will be May 5th
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 09:48:51 +0300
Subject: Re: [Vo]:resurrection of Rossi?
From: peter.gl...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Caro Giovanni,
Cathlic Esater Sunday was March 31; this is a retardedreaction from Rossi, he
being an agile entrepreneur andfast
Do you hope to read the 3rd Party Report till then?
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 5:22 PM, DJ Cravens djcrav...@hotmail.com wrote:
orthodox Easter will be May 5th
--
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 09:48:51 +0300
Subject: Re: [Vo]:resurrection of Rossi?
From:
I have given up ever seeing an unfiltered third party result from Rossi.
History does not show any evidence that he truly will allow such investigation.
I also wonder about Defkalion's presentation in Austin in Aug. Specifically,
if it will be a touchable demonstration or just words about
From: David Roberson
I have been attempting to understand if or why there is a difference in the
behavior of high frequency photons as compared to those that we can easily
measure. '
There is, but it is not easy to follow. It involves going from inverse 4th
to 5th powers. Here is a
Dear Dennis,
The results obtained in the tests of Rossi in 2011, with
or without steam have to be explained in some way.
My guess is he has lower performances and problems
of control. Sooner or later he has to show something or
will perish. His message of today was incoherent. Possible
relation
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
Possible
relation to John Barleycorn?
Considering his heritage, more likely Dionysus. :-)
Bacchus but if he prefers strong drinks and is
in the US? Who knows... I am unable to 'get'
this non-communications with the Professors...
And at my age few things can surprise me
Peter
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 6:58 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 11:09 AM,
, 14 Apr 2013 09:11:45 -0700
http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.comq=date:20130414
Bacchus but if he prefers strong drinks and is
in the US? Who knows... I am unable to 'get'
this non-communications with the Professors...
And at my age few things can surprise me
Peter
In reply to David Roberson's message of Sun, 14 Apr 2013 01:10:28 -0400 (EDT):
Hi,
[snip]
I am not familiar with a process that accelerates the decay of isotopes, but
perhaps this is possible. Do you know of any method that can be employed to
determine whether or not this can be done?
NMR
In reply to David Roberson's message of Sun, 14 Apr 2013 01:39:29 -0400 (EDT):
Hi,
[snip]
OK Robin,
The frequency of a 1 kilometer wavelength radiated signal would be as follows:
(f = c / wavelength). or in this case f = 300 million meters per second /
1000 meters or 300 kilohertz. This is
In reply to David Roberson's message of Sun, 14 Apr 2013 01:29:19 -0400 (EDT):
Hi,
[snip]
Has anyone figured out a theory as to where the energy comes from to drive the
motor? Are the magnets depleted with time?
I think you can get a measure of the maximum energy stored in the magnets by
That is a big particle. Perhaps we should keep in mind that the particles that
find their way through slit experiments are not like billiard balls, but behave
more like a wave packet. I still am wondering how to interpret the behavior of
such a packet once it hits the screen following the
Don't confuse force with energy.
From: David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2013 3:49:20 PM
I am having a difficult time judging the amount of energy stored in
these magnets. I recall almost having a finger removed when holding
a piece of steel near a powerful rare earth magnet. The force
attracting
If you are referring to my statement about the magnet and steel, I am not
confusing them. The force being applied to the steel is attempting to make it
come into contact with the magnet. Energy is being released by the magnet as
it draws the metal closer since it is having to work against my
So there are two somewhat simple possibilities.
1: Magnets become demagnetized, the energy stored in their fields is
depleted.
2: The magnets enter a state of greater attraction or greater repulsion or
both over the run, this is essentially then a high tech spring that is
being unwound.
But do
I always find this subject interesting to discuss. One could consider every
piece of iron in the universe to posses potential energy in relation to a
powerful magnet. Any of these iron things could be brought closer to our
magnet and it would find itself subject to a force that could impart
Well one interesting thought is if we have a magnet, and there is nothing
else magnetic, then no energy can be tapped from it, but it still cost the
same to establish the field.
Additionally it we let iron particle cover our magnet until there is
no observable outside field (still there really,
John,
You are pointing out some interesting possibilities. I suspect that the
internal field pattern of the magnetized material in your item 1 is adjusted by
the placement of new metal around the magnet. It might actually increase the
net flux locked within the total structure since there
Well one interesting thought is if we have a magnet, and there is nothing else
magnetic, then no energy can be tapped from it, but it still cost the same to
establish the field.
We could move a coil of wire through the field of the lonely magnetic. I
suppose that if we had to move the coil
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 5:08 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
The important questions that we need answered are how much actual energy is
stored in the original magnet and how much can we borrow? Who wants to
tackle these questions?
I'll give it an attempt. The energy stored in
Eric,
That is a good start at the procedure. Can you come up with some calculations
to fill in the blanks? We need to have an idea of the total number of joules
of energy contained within a powerful magnetic of known dimensions. Perhaps
you could estimate one that would fit into the Yildiz
You have failed to tackle the real question.
If we have say a permanent magnet, and a C core, as we pass the magnet into
the C core, an inductive field is established.
If the inductive field will also effect the atoms, and if the material is
aligned, then the aligned atoms will have energy
If that is true, then it follows that the Earth is doing work on
Harry
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 7:41 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
If you are referring to my statement about the magnet and steel, I am not
confusing them. The force being applied to the steel is attempting to
28 matches
Mail list logo
