-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 14 Aug 2013 08:20:32 -0700:
Hi,
>First off, tritium hydride - even if proton tunneling were to occur, is
>unlikely to fuse into helium at all unless it was part of a coincidental
>beta decay. However,
The heat can be used produce to steam which can turn an armature in the
presence of the magnetic. From the point of view of the rotating armature
the magnetic flux will vary so a electric current can be generated
Harry
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 8:50 PM, James Bowery wrote:
> People keep saying "
I wrote:
It seems that the "tunneling" in this instance refers to a chemical rather
> than a nuclear reaction. The "barrier" in this case would be for the
> chemical reaction. If this is true, this paper is probably talking about
> something more mundane than what we're interested in.
>
I see t
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 14 Aug 2013 08:20:32 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
>First off, tritium hydride - even if proton tunneling were to occur, is
>unlikely to fuse into helium at all unless it was part of a coincidental
>beta decay. However, tritium deuteride would be a much better candida
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 5:11 AM, Alain Sepeda wrote:
Accelerated chemistry in the reaction between the hydroxyl radical and
> methanol at interstellar temperatures facilitated by tunnelling
> Robin J. Shannon, Mark A. Blitz, Andrew Goddard & Dwayne E. Heard
> http://www.nature.com/nchem/journal/va
Alan Fletcher wrote:
> Hadjichristos (sp) specifically said in the demo that they were keeping
> the modulation of the HV pulse fixed, to avoid complicating the test -- and
> they usually used this for fine control. (Duty cycle?)
>
Ah. I missed that, or I forgot it. In that case maybe they do h
> From: "Jed Rothwell"
> Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 2:01:13 PM
> "I do not think they have proved it is fully controllable. I did not
> see them modulate the reaction or turn it on and off repeatedly."
>
> You should go back an review the ICCF-18 Delkalion demo again.
> Control of the reac
I think Google Scholar has a "cited by" # when you search on the title.
If you could populate your DB with that info, it might cool.
Could be able to use google api or do some sort of script with curl to get
the info
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> See:
>
> http://lenr-
See:
http://lenr-canr.org/wordpress/?p=1486
The speed of this project depends on how bored I get copying the
information into the EndNote database, and how much other stuff crops up.
This calls for a many-to-many relational database. EndNote supports that
but my primitive on-line copy does not.
Axil Axil wrote:
"I do not think they have proved it is fully controllable. I did not see
> them modulate the reaction or turn it on and off repeatedly."
>
> You should go back an review the ICCF-18 Delkalion demo again. Control of
> the reactor was a major demo objective that was successfully ac
"I do not think they have proved it is fully controllable. I did not see
them modulate the reaction or turn it on and off repeatedly."
You should go back an review the ICCF-18 Delkalion demo again. Control of
the reactor was a major demo objective that was successfully accomplished.
On Wed, Au
"I suppose Defkalion learned many of their techniques from him. (A court
will probably have to decide how many, someday.)"
There are any unsupported assumptions in your post. Therefore it is a poor
one.
Defkalion learned many of their techniques from open source documents as
they has previous
just a very general remark..
LENR is a strange domain which challenge our knowledge in cognition,
psychology...
I discovered much about sociology of science, media, science journals, free
energy fans, ufoists, hot fusion physicist, entrepreneurs, green
entrepreneurs...
and what happen now, is eve
Peter Gluck wrote:
To remain at the Greeks, this magnetic field story is interpreted as
> an Achilles' Heel of the story - it is NOT! and 20 times more words
> were used for this than for the fact that the Hyperion generates
> controllable
> copious heat.
>
All functioning cold fusion reactors p
To remain at the Greeks, this magnetic field story is interpreted as
an Achilles' Heel of the story - it is NOT! and 20 times more words
were used for this than for the fact that the Hyperion generates
controllable
copious heat.
Peter
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Peter
Peter Gluck wrote:
However I think it is more important that DGT has cut
> some Gordian Knots
>
They are Greek, after all.
I think overall they tied as many new knots as they cut. It was a good
first step but people have many questions about it, including people who
are Friends Of Cold Fusion w
The Ni/H reactor may be something new in science and technology because it
is a macro quantum system; a quantum system where quantum mechanical
properties become manifest on the macro level of the real world.
The dipoles that exist in the billions are easily synchronized through the
exchange o
One way to exactly characterize the magnetic fields in the Ni/H reactor is
to use neutron scattering as a probe of the magnetic field.
The neutrons (a polarized mono-energetic neutron beam) will be unaffected
by everything, for example electric charge or plasma reactions but will be
affected by th
It certainly would be helpful if DGT supplied supporting evidence of the very
large magnetic field. I agree with Jed that it might be premature to jump to
conclusions as to the reality of the field, but I also believe that it does
little harm for theoretical concepts to be suggested that depend
From: Alain Sepeda
Does tritium hydride exhibit measurable spontaneous fusion via proton
tunneling?
http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/73899/does-tritium-hydride-exhibi
t-measurable-spontaneous-fusion-via-proton-tunneling
First off, tritium hydride - even if proton tunneling were to o
However I think it is more important that DGT has cut
some Gordian Knots
Peter
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Edmund Storms wrote:
>
>> Dfkalion also reports high RF interference with the phone systems and
>> their SCADA function.
>>
>>
>> Yes, which indicates that thei
Edmund Storms wrote:
> Dfkalion also reports high RF interference with the phone systems and
> their SCADA function.
>
>
> Yes, which indicates that their claim for a 1.6 T magnetic field resulted
> from a misreading of the Gauss meter, perhaps because the meter was
> influenced by an RF field, n
does anybody here have heard of that question. I don't find it in the
archive, so maybe it is new here.
Does tritium hydride exhibit measurable spontaneous fusion via proton
tunneling?
http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/73899/does-tritium-hydride-exhibit-measurable-spontaneous-fusion-via-
For what we know ,
Rossi's device is anisotropic , excited by incoherent heat, while Defkalion
reactor is oriented by the plasma flux... Some says the plasma/current is
flowing through the material.
This may justify stable oriented field on one side (defkalion) ,and
unstable (messy transient spin
24 matches
Mail list logo
