On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 3:41 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
You can get an idea of this from the HUP where delta E x delta t = h_bar/2.
If delta E is the energy of the reaction (about 4 MeV), then you get a
time of
at least 8E-23 sec.
(I think this is the way it is normally calculated.)
In
Papers in English, Dutch and German:
http://repository.tudelft.nl/search/philips/?q=reifenschweilertype=year=
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com
In reply to Axil Axil's message:
If the cause of LENR is the excitation of the vacuum through the
injection of very energetic EMF (magnetic), it might be possible that the
energy intensive magnetic fields supported by exothermic gainful
And to a lesser degree may relate to granary explosions, pyrophoricuty and
maybe even Papp noble gas engine in that we may be dealing with Casimir
geometries forming in ambient gases that break the isotropy creating the NAE,
literally on the fly, as the reaction expands or contracts the gases
One further point relative to... it would surprise no one to learn that a
nickel version is also used (nominally NiOOH).
As mentioned before wrt Rydberg holes in nickel and iron, the combination of
the two (found in the Rossi reactor as well) is especially energetic for
ground state redundancy,
Bob,
The way you are describing the electromagnetic interactions below suggest that
they are a normal two way process. By this I mean that energy can be exchanged
in both directions so that it is possible for a nuclei in the low energy state
to be brought up to an excited state by external
I believe that this type of mechanism is the source of the amazing megawatt
level heat production seen in the Rossi meltdown process where the nickel
powder has melted down and the high temperature insulation is breaking down
into nanoparticles at 2000C.
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Roarty,
Edmund Storms' new book is available today! Christy will be shipping
them from the Infinite Energy office.
/The Explanation of Low Energy Nuclear Reaction: / /An Examination of
the Relationship between Observation and Explanation/ by Edmund Storms
See http://lenrexplained.com/
Also,
A response: See
http://coldfusionnow.org/science-inspired-by-martin-fleischmann/
@ Greg Goble
Regarding:
Snip
Imaging the World. Landmark Award for Chemistry Breakthrough – University
of Southampton
http://www.southampton.ac.uk/promotion/surface_enhanced_raman_spectroscopy_01.shtml
The
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
Sent: Monday, July 7, 2014 6:37:10 AM
The dates are a bit confusing. I loaded the most recent (2014-06-19) and
thought -- gee, they can't still be using typewriters !!??
Nope, it was a 1965 typewritten report.
Here are the titles, abstracts and so on that I just added to my database:
Reference Type: Report
Author: Bihl, V., Reifenschweiler, O. and Ligt, van de
Year: 1965
Title: Experimente Zur Darstellung Von Temperaturfesten Metall-Tritium
Systemen
Institution: Philips Corporation
Publisher: Library,
One of the author names was formatted wrong. It should be:
van de Ligt, G.
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Sun, 6 Jul 2014 13:59:19 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
http://physics.aps.org/synopsis-for/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.012001
Gluons Chip in for Proton Spin
No, it just means they rotate. The magnetic field would come from the rotation
of the quarks.
It looks like polarized
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Mon, 7 Jul 2014 06:41:53 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Not quite the same as LENR but close, since apparently with the military
version of nano-thermite, instead of finding the usual nanoparticles of
magnetite, we find that a ferrihydrite (nominally FeOOH) is used, which
This is an interesting discussion about a powerful explosive material(50x
normal). Could it be that the military will go to lengths to keep this out of
the public use? I suspect that they would stagnate progress completely if they
have their chance. It is good that cars, air planes, and all
From the referenced article:
Snip
The quarks have spin 1/2, so physicists originally assumed that two of the
quarks were in opposite alignment (cancelling their spin), leaving one
unpaired quark to give the proton spin. However, measurements of
muon-proton collisions found only a quarter of the
Papp had the patent on this exploding water technology. It is in the public
domain now.
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 6:41 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
This is an interesting discussion about a powerful explosive material(50x
normal). Could it be that the military will go to lengths
Note that we have other papers by O.R., and there are some others I do not
have copies of. Here is the list, from http://lenr-canr.org/DetailOnly.htm:
3036. Reifenschweiler, O., *Reduced radioactivity of tritium in small
titanium particles.* Phys. Lett. A, 1994. *184*: p. 149.
First Author:
It is my contention that one of the many mechanisms of magnetic based LENR
reactions is that photons (magnetic) can pump energy into the
proton(and/or neutron) to the point where gluons in the proton(s) and/or
neutrons(s) will get to and surpass an energy saturation level. At that
point of
This is that same isotope stabilization effects seen is laser based
nanoplasmonic experiments performed with gold nanoparticles.
From a previous post except in part as follows:
have referenced papers here to show how the confinement of electrons on
the surface of gold nanoparticles: a
The power density implied by a continuous 6 month test of Rossi's reactor
tells me that the energy source that drives the Ni/H reactor must be
nuclear and can not chemical. This excludes the hydrino mechanism from
LENR.
The neutron bands in transition metal lattices may be the result of magnetic
decoupling of neutrons from the nuclei of the transition metal. This would
possibly make the neutrons available for transmutations and energy release to
the lattice--consistent with Axil’s idea about the polarization
22 matches
Mail list logo
