[Vo]:An Argument for a 2.3 pm Inter-nuclear Distance in D(0) (latest Holmlid-Olafsson paper)

2015-12-10 Thread Mark Jurich
A recent paper (article in press) has appeared (about a month ago?), submitted just before the Olafsson talks in the SF Bay Area, a couple months ago: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360319915304687 In it, the authors attempt to address an argument posed by some that an

RE: [Vo]:An Argument for a 2.3 pm Inter-nuclear Distance in D(0) (latest Holmlid-Olafsson paper)

2015-12-10 Thread Jones Beene
Mark, It would not be a surprise if Holmlid et al - have gotten this detail (2.3 pm) wrong, but it seems like a minor point in the big picture. They could be sitting on the discovery of the century. IMO it is a waste of time to dwell on that type of detail, when there is so much at stake on

[Vo]:1200 MW compressed air storage

2015-12-10 Thread Jed Rothwell
This describes 1200 MW for 48 hours, in compressed air stored in salt caves. It resembles pumped hydroelectric storage. http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/articles/2015/12/1-200-mw-compressed-air-project-evaluated-for-utah-site.html - Jed

Re: [Vo]:An Argument for a 2.3 pm Inter-nuclear Distance in D(0) (latest Holmlid-Olafsson paper)

2015-12-10 Thread Mark Jurich
FYI: In order to facilitate the discussion and allow those viewing via the Vortex-L Mail Archive Site, here is an image of the typeset paragraphs from the paper: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8JYGNuoJRzFWFNnaVhjY0VRZVU/view From: Mark Jurich Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 12:13 PM To:

Re: [Vo]:An Argument for a 2.3 pm Inter-nuclear Distance in D(0) (latest Holmlid-Olafsson paper)

2015-12-10 Thread Axil Axil
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jZeHFNWFElk Making Monopoles in the Lab This is a good find. The method to produce a analog magnetic monopole is to get all the spins of the members of the condensate to point in the same direction and overlap. The Surface Plasmon Polariton is such a quantum

[Vo]:LENR through monopoles

2015-12-10 Thread Axil Axil
All the various and sundry miracles of LENR are a direct fallout of the behavior of the Exotic Neutral Particle (ENP) that is the causative factor in LENR and the monopole magnetic field that it generates. This special type of magnetism has been a study and an obsession of science for over a

Re: [Vo]:An Argument for a 2.3 pm Inter-nuclear Distance in D(0) (latest Holmlid-Olafsson paper)

2015-12-10 Thread Axil Axil
The magic in Rydberg matter is not in the molecules themselves but how the molecules reformate EMF input to produce magnetic monopoles . The graphite like staking of a long stings of hexagon shaped plates produce EMF monopole magnetic projections. Water crystals have the same sting like structure

Re: [Vo]:Steorn Orbo cube phone-charger ~$1300

2015-12-10 Thread William Beaty
On Wed, 9 Dec 2015, Esa Ruoho wrote: > What is different about an Orbo power cell, and again, we showed a > brief example of building, hand-building a very simple cell is that, > first of all, it is not an electrochemical device, so there is no ion > transfer, there's no electrolyte and so

Re: [Vo]:Steorn Orbo cube phone-charger ~$1300

2015-12-10 Thread William Beaty
On Wed, 9 Dec 2015, esa ruoho wrote: Bill, is that based on what you read on the transcripts? They do state that it seems like a galvanic cell but doesn't work like it. Yes, just the transcripts. Initially I assumed that it was "Orbo," meaning a rotary or vibrating device with coils. The

Re: [Vo]:Steorn Orbo cube phone-charger ~$1300

2015-12-10 Thread William Beaty
On Wed, 9 Dec 2015, esa ruoho wrote: Bill, here's another claim from Shaun McCarthy: A: You will never need to charge an ophone So, just wait to see if it's real. If Steorn has a sudden reversal, and can finally show genuine stuff, then yay, at last! But if they're scammers, then ophone

Re: [Vo]:Steorn Orbo cube phone-charger ~$1300

2015-12-10 Thread William Beaty
On Wed, 9 Dec 2015, Bob Higgins wrote: This motor is certainly not a perpetual motion machine, but it is an electrostatic motor. It bears a striking resemblance to a Wimshurst generator, which could be used as a motor, and also to Jefimenko's electrostatic motors. Electrostatic motors are

Re: [Vo]:Steorn Orbo cube phone-charger ~$1300

2015-12-10 Thread Esa J. Ruoho
Here is a new one https://www.facebook.com/thebatteryisdead/videos/10153398806872672/ "some additional details of the Orbo power cell", Transcribed by Esa Juhani Ruoho / esaru...@icloud.com / http://lackluster.bandcamp.com/ OK so a lot of people are asking what's the difference between an

[Vo]:LENR INFO, DISCUSSION ABOUT STEAM FROM ROSSI"S PLANT

2015-12-10 Thread Peter Gluck
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/12/10-dec-2015-lenr-info-and-discussion.html I remember with gratitude the bright "Perry's "Chemical Engineer's Handbook" my professional Bible a few decades ago. I think: Who will write "The LENR Engineer's Handbook" and what will be its real title? Peter

Re: [Vo]:The conspiracies do exist!

2015-12-10 Thread Alain Sepeda
there are people who are so desperate they they get paid for an article. some are paid for a research direction and a career of coherent results. Who is the most dishonest ? moreover be careful to hear the defense too, and today journalist and activists have a tendency to transform benign

Re: [Vo]: How many atoms to make condensed matter?

2015-12-10 Thread Eric Walker
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 10:45 PM, Jones Beene wrote: *From:* Eric Walker > > > > The nuclear force is very short range. > > > > Ø Here is where I'm inclined to part with conventional wisdom. > [...snip...] > This is arguable not true. > Interesting points. Also, it

Re: [Vo]:Steorn Orbo cube phone-charger ~$1300

2015-12-10 Thread Jed Rothwell
William Beaty wrote: > This motor is certainly not a perpetual motion machine, but it is an >> electrostatic motor. . . . > > > > Yeah, Jefimenko couldn't get them to turn using balloon-wire antennas, > until they tried it from the top of a parking garage. Nearby buildings

[Vo]:Re: How many atoms to make condensed matter?

2015-12-10 Thread Bob Cook
Jones stated in response to Eric: <<>> From: Eric Walker: <<>> Now, I am even further inclined to part with conventional wisdom. As Hatt has recently suggested, the quark model is merely a good empirical model of protons and neutrons, and is not consistent with all observations of