RE: [Vo]:rare event- information abundance in LENR

The Quark-x temperatures are much higher. However, I do not believe there is a true plasma. Cooling would be to great with the Li vapor around. I would say small drops of Ni may be present with a structure that still could promote LENR, assuming the drops have the correct fuel to support a

Re: [Vo]:rare event- information abundance in LENR

Axil Axil wrote: The LENR developers that you are backing . . . > I am not backing any particular developers. I back all researchers, but not the frauds such as Rossi and Defkalion. I do not know anything about the SunCell, but those people say they are not doing cold

Re: [Vo]:rare event- information abundance in LENR

The LENR developers that you are backing better get their buts in gear, or they will be left far behind in the marketplace by these plasma based LENR products. Sometimes words are not enough. On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 5:10 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Axil Axil

Re: [Vo]:rare event- information abundance in LENR

Axil Axil wrote: > What is the difference between the SunCell and the QuarkX...not much if > anything. > Indeed, they are both figments of the imagination. - Jed

Re: [Vo]:rare event- information abundance in LENR

​One of the obvious implications of these recent QuarkX revelations found in the recent Rossi theory is that LENR theory has nothing to do with anything relating to lattice based processes. LENR exists in a plasma based environment. 28 years of palladium based hydrogen loading theory, cracks,

[Vo]:rare event- information abundance in LENR

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/03/mar-24-2017-lenr-coping-with.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Re: [Vo]:Gullstrom-Rossi theory of nuclear/electron-spin-orbit coupling with nuclear transitions to lower potential energy

Stephen, yes that is interesting, but Gullstrom should have teamed up with Holmlid, not Rossi. Holmlid claims to have seen muons, and Rossi's claim is nickel and lithium isotopic shifts. There is really no similarity. But basically the paper is a sham, in that it does not present any

Re: [Vo]:Gullstrom-Rossi theory of nuclear/electron-spin-orbit coupling with nuclear transitions to lower potential energy

Well one thing I found interesting is the light Sigma Mesons referred to in this paper is I think around 500MeV. This is quite close I think to the mass of the Kaons. Could nucleon resonance of a Sigma Meson some how open the door to Kaon emission? There is a nucleon resonance window for Phi

Re: [Vo]:Gullstrom-Rossi theory of nuclear/electron-spin-orbit coupling with nuclear transitions to lower potential energy

Hi Frank, You know since discovering your book I have always found your ideas interesting. I should take a look at it again though it's been a while. I do think ideas have their time and come round again sometimes decades later. Sometimes after future breakthroughs people revisit past ideas