Re: [Vo]:D. Alexandrov, Proposal for the development of an LENR reactor

I have rejected the common concept of "heavy" electrons as applicable to LENR by simple reasoning. The definition of electron and hole effective mass in a semiconductor refers to the acceleration in that material from a force applied, m =* F/a*). This mass increase does not apply *within* a confine

Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

Hilmlid claims that his theory of Ultra dense hydrogen is based on the hole superconductor theory put forth by J. E. Hirsch . This theory is based to energy minimization and the theory of least action. https://arxiv.org/abs/

Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

In reply to Jones Beene's message of Tue, 26 Feb 2019 14:10:08 + (UTC): Hi, [snip] > Here is another paper by the inventor Salvatore Pais. >Initially, this makes one wonder if either Dr Pais is an alien from an >advanced civilization, a collection of Navy jokesters, or a nut-case deluxe. >OT

Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

In reply to Brian Ahern's message of Tue, 26 Feb 2019 14:37:02 +: Hi, [snip] >He did consider both types. The maximum Tc was 240K. Don't we already have high TC superconductors with a higher TC? [snip] Regards, Robin van Spaandonk local asymmetry = temporary success

Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

No. Positive charge carriers were not contemplated. From: bobcook39...@hotmail.com Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2019 11:57 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit Does the Keith Johnson model add

RE: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

Does the Keith Johnson model address POSITIVE charge carriers? It sounds like electrons were considered in his model—what about protons—in a surface plasmonic array in a line of nano particles, each supporting its own plasma. Or maybe a surface plasma of paired electron---Cooper paired elect

Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

He did consider both types. The maximum Tc was 240K. From: Jones Beene Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2019 8:50 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit Brian, According to Keith Johnson's formalism

Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

Here is another paper by the inventor Salvatore Pais. Initially, this makes one wonder if either Dr Pais is an alien from an advanced civilization, a collection of Navy jokesters, or a nut-case deluxe. OTOH - the paper is just competent enough to be taken somewhat seriously, despite its lack of

Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

Brian, According to Keith Johnson's formalism, what is the highest Tc which is possible ? Did he consider both Type-I and Type-II ? Brian Ahern wrote: > Keith Johnson retired from MIT in 1996. His formalism is known to a small > number of scientists. https://phys.org/news/2019-02-navy-

Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

I apologize for the bombast. I was the DoD designated scientist to investigate high Tc in 1987. After interviewing many top theoretical physicists I settled on MIT professor, Keith Johnson. He had developed a set of programs that evaluated all of the electron orbitals in a cluster of atoms. He