Re: [Vo]:UFOs are getting dangerous

On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 7:45 PM Terry Blanton wrote: > Agreed. They are possibly transdimensionals, including transtemporal, > likely us, centuries from now returning to recover lost or purged genetic > characteristics. > Or not.

Re: [Vo]:UFOs are getting dangerous

Agreed. They are possibly transdimensionals, including transtemporal, likely us, centuries from now returning to recover lost or purged genetic characteristics.

Re: [Vo]:Google Project Finds No Evidence of Cold Fusion

Terry Blanton wrote: WTF? > Strange, isn't it? As they say in show biz, any news is good news.

Re: [Vo]:Berlinguette, C.P., et al., Revisiting the cold case of cold fusion. Nature, 2019

Note there are two other articles in Nature about the Google experiment. Both of them insufferable bullshit: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-01675-9 https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-01683-9

[Vo]:Re: Google Project Finds No Evidence of Cold Fusion

As usual, Jed's already on top of this. Next time, I'll read before I post. On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 12:59 PM Terry Blanton wrote: > WTF? > > https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-01683-9 > > Google’s project — revealed in a peer-reviewed *Nature* Perspective1 >

[Vo]:Google Project Finds No Evidence of Cold Fusion

WTF? https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-01683-9 Google’s project — revealed in a peer-reviewed *Nature* Perspective1 this week — found no evidence that cold fusion is possible, but made some advances in measurement and

[Vo]:Another take on LENR from MIT?

https://phys.org/news/2019-05-discusses-reopening-case-cold-fusion.html