After drying the colloidal silica like the Ludox <https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/BE/en/product/aldrich/420832> https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/BE/en/product/aldrich/420832 is also very highly transparent.
Your coating if like fused silica is a good candidate to make a diffusion barrier of H2. At high temperature(above 800°C) SS and metals diffuse H2 like a sponge. A layer of your product might stop the diffusion (damper it at least) if it is well crystalized and resist multiple heatings and coolings without deterioration due to thermal expansion difference between metals (or SS) and the SiO2 layer. Some powders at high temperature are showing more and more interesting results for LENR. The leakage of H2 trough the vessel walls in such experiments is still a problem without a satisfactory solution. This may worth a try. Could it be easily applied on an inner surface of a pipe to have a layer like 100~1000µm? What will be the behaviour with heating/cooling cycles over time. From: MSF <foster...@protonmail.com> Sent: 22 December 2022 02:23 To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Solar cell lifetime in space I'm not sure of the actual crystalline structure, but it's not like silica gel, which displays substantial optical diffusion. Given the fact that it's highly transparent to the point of invisibility, I'm making the assumption that the structure is similar to fused quartz. ------- Original Message ------- On Wednesday, December 21st, 2022 at 8:32 AM, Arnaud Kodeck <arnaud.kod...@lakoco.be <mailto:arnaud.kod...@lakoco.be> > wrote: What is the crystal structure of the adhered layer ? Amorphous (sort of silica gel) or crystallized (crystalline quartz) ? From: MSF <foster...@protonmail.com <mailto:foster...@protonmail.com> > Sent: 21 December 2022 00:00 To: vortex-l@eskimo.com <mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Solar cell lifetime in space I was working with this method of surface treatment of glass more decades ago than I care to remember. You simply immerse ordinary glass into a bath of molten potassium nitrate and the sodium Ions at the surface are replaced with potassium ions, resulting in a highly impact resistant glass. These days it's called gorilla glass, but I was using this technique long before Corning. I see that cerium doped sheet is just glass, not fused silica. So it may be that no cerium ions could be implanted into pure silica by the molten salt technique. I recently discovered a method of depositing a layer of silica on any given surface using a ridiculously simple and inexpensive technique. This is something that should have been discovered 200 or so years ago, but wasn't. I've searched for months trying to find out if this was done before, but I find no reference to it. The silica layer deposited is only a few tens of microns thick, but the process can be repeated. Other compounds can be included; so far I've only tried copper. This is a solid transparent well adhered layer, not some powdered composite. I really don't know what to do with this, probably nothing. Thought you might be interested anyway. ------- Original Message ------- On Tuesday, December 20th, 2022 at 10:00 PM, Andrew Meulenberg <mules...@gmail.com <mailto:mules...@gmail.com> > wrote: Foster, You have raised an interesting possibility. I have been out of the loop for 25 years, so my info may be dated. However, the cerium was included in the melt, with the quantity a djusted for the optimum UV absorption for the coverslide thickness. Use of a doped layer rather than the bulk could possibly provide some improved optical matching in the "STACK". It would have to be tested for stability during the thermal cycles. If the surface doping (by dipping or by ion implantation) is a reliable process, this might be worth mentioning it to the appropriate people (who I no longer know). Andrew ---------- Forwarded message --------- I guess this is getting off into the weeds a bit, but is the quartz layer doped with cerium in the mass? Or is the cerium diffused into the surface by immersion in a molten cerium compound? -- On Tuesday, December 20th, 2022 at 2:26 AM, Andrew Meulenberg <mules...@gmail.com <mailto:mules...@gmail.com> > wrote: >
