I doubt it's a translation issue.
On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 at 22:24, ROGER ANDERTON
wrote:
> Part of the problem is - can translate Einstein's 1905 SR paper in
> different ways into English. In 1905 he doesn't mention one-way and two-way
> lightspeed. So, now in retrospect can try to impose on him
Part of the problem is - can translate Einstein's 1905 SR paper in
different ways into English. In 1905 he doesn't mention one-way and
two-way lightspeed. So, now in retrospect can try to impose on him what
he should have meant using those terms.
-- Original Message --
From:
If you ask most people, most physicists, and most LLM's (Large Language
Models) if the one way speed of light is constant they all will say it is
and that it is part of Special Relativity (SR).
If you ask most, "how can that be", they will answer the contraction of
space and dilation of time, but
3 matches
Mail list logo
