: [Vo]: Re: Ed Storm's confusion (was Re: [Vo]: Cold Fusion skeptic
Dr. Michael Shermer)
Yo Jed, it's not a matter of telling someone how to speak his native language.
The vocabulary of science is meant to allow accurate communication between
scientists, so that e.g. when one says electrolyzed
- Original Message -
From: Michel Jullian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 10:13 PM
Subject: [Vo]: Re: Ed Storm's confusion (was Re: [Vo]: Cold Fusion skeptic Dr.
Michael Shermer)
- Original Message -
From: Edmund Storms [EMAIL PROTECTED
: [Vo]: Cold Fusion skeptic Dr.
Michael Shermer)
- Original Message -
From: Edmund Storms [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 4:01 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Re: Ed Storm's confusion (was Re: [Vo]: Cold Fusion skeptic
Dr. Michael Shermer)
Michel
@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 10:13 PM
Subject: [Vo]: Re: Ed Storm's confusion (was Re: [Vo]: Cold Fusion skeptic Dr.
Michael Shermer)
- Original Message -
From: Edmund Storms [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 4:01 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo
@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 5:58 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Re: Ed Storm's confusion (was Re: [Vo]: Cold Fusion skeptic
Dr. Michael Shermer)
So that no confusion remains in any reader's mind. The word electrolyze
applies to a process of passing current through an ionic solution.
Various
Michel Jullian wrote:
How can you persist in this attempt to reivent the terms of
electrochemistry? Whatever happens to the palladium, it is not
'electro-chemically decomposed' (the meaning of 'electrolyzed'), cf
the Faraday quote.
Yo, Michel: Don't tell a native speaker how to speak his
]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com; vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 9:15 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Re: Ed Storm's confusion (was Re: [Vo]: Cold Fusion skeptic
Dr. Michael Shermer)
Michel Jullian wrote:
How can you persist in this attempt to reivent the terms of
electrochemistry? Whatever happens
on the merits!
Michel
- Original Message -
From: Michel Jullian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 7:05 AM
Subject: [Vo]: Ed Storm's confusion (was Re: [Vo]: Cold Fusion skeptic Dr.
Michael Shermer)
Do you still not see it Ed?
Michel
-
From: Michel Jullian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 7:05 AM
Subject: [Vo]: Ed Storm's confusion (was Re: [Vo]: Cold Fusion skeptic Dr.
Michael Shermer)
Do you still not see it Ed?
Michel
- Original Message -
From: Michel Jullian [EMAIL
9 matches
Mail list logo
