: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 5:44 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]: SUVs
For the record, I do support not allowing the manufacture of NEW SUVS. But
to take already existing and owned cars? No.
--Kyle
Someone (John Steck?) wrote:
Just a question to all the pontificators... how is a family of 5 or more
to
travel about in this age of seat belts and car seats? Guess what...
minivans and SUVs for many of us are a legislated requirement not a
luxury.
Minivans get good gas mileage and they
Those small cars were something like 11 times more likely to kill you, plus they are ugly.On 9/29/06, Kyle R. Mcallister
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:- Original Message -From: John Steck
[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: vortex-l@eskimo.comSent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 11:17 PMSubject: RE: [Vo
:17 PM
Subject: RE: [Vo]: SUVs
Just a question to all the pontificators... how is a family of 5 or more
to
travel about in this age of seat belts and car seats? Guess what...
minivans and SUVs for many of us are a legislated requirement not a
luxury.
Minivans are ok in my book, our old
- Original Message -
From: Philip Winestone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 7:03 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: SUVs
But NOBODY can answer the question I ask constantly (in fact I've been
greeted with consistently stony silence, even from journalists
are now?
P.
At 07:49 PM 9/28/2006 -0400, you wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Philip Winestone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 7:03 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: SUVs
But NOBODY can answer the question I ask constantly (in fact I've been
greeted
6 matches
Mail list logo