In reply to OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson's message of Fri, 20 May 2011
07:24:55 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
From Robin:
[snip]
Is there anyone who believes Mills' hydrino theory who also understands
quantum mechanics?
Yes, Mills. :)
(Actually he's not the only one, there are probably quite
This paper is pretty harsh.
http://iopscience.iop.org/1367-2630/7/1/127/pdf/njp5_1_127.pdf It's difficult
to imagine how the CQM advocates could have adequately addressed these
questions.
Sent from my iPhone.
On May 21, 2011, at 3:23, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to OrionWorks -
From Robin:
[snip]
Is there anyone who believes Mills' hydrino theory who also understands
quantum mechanics?
Yes, Mills. :)
(Actually he's not the only one, there are probably quite a few, but far
less
that would go out on a limb and admit it.)
Personally I think QM is the norm, and
Is there anyone who believes Mills' hydrino theory who also understands quantum
mechanics?
Sent from my iPhone.
On May 15, 2011, at 16:08, Mark Iverson zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
I renamed this thread cuz I'd like to hear opinions as to WHY an engineer
succeeded where ALL the scientists
about the ideas of this thread:
An analogy: Why lowly apples have obtained such wonderful results in
genetic engineering, while oranges despite of billions of $ of funding had
not achieved a single usable result?
The answer a bit tautologic is - because apples are apples and oranges are
oranges.
From Peter:
...
I think it is outrigth logical fallacy to compare
Mills' hyperchemistry to Rossi's nuclear jiu-jitsu.
Why not? The fact that both processes appear to use nickel powder,
hydrogen, a mystery catalyst, and heat certainly suggests there may
very well exist linkage.
Mills has
1- as far I know Ni is not a reactant in the Catalyst Induced hydrino
Transition Process.
In judging Mills reaction to the E-cat we have to consider how busy is he
now- and that in this stage he has to solve many engineering
not scientific problems. The proof is in the...CIHT, it works this year
In reply to Peter Gluck's message of Mon, 16 May 2011 09:11:34 +0300:
Hi,
[snip]
I think it is outrigth logical fallacy to compare Mills' hyperchemistry to
Rossi's nuclear jiu-jitsu. Mills has told me that his process has nothing to
do with Rossi's and he is not interested in what Ross has done.
I renamed this thread cuz I'd like to hear opinions as to WHY an engineer
succeeded where ALL the
scientists failed in optimizing the excess heat and controllability of whatever
this reaction is???
In our conversation about Mills/BLP, Peter wrote:
His theory is OK, verified by experiment.
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Mark Iverson zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
I renamed this thread cuz I'd like to hear opinions as to WHY an engineer
succeeded where ALL the scientists failed in optimizing the excess heat and
controllability of whatever this reaction is???
Edisonian vs
Mark,
The one remaining possibility which could explain how the brilliant
scientist Mills' is being outflanked and outscored - thoroughly, and by a
lowly engineer working on a few percent of his budget, could relate to that
mysterious product: the CIHT, mentioned by Peter. It could be his last
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
The one remaining possibility which could explain how the brilliant
scientist Mills’ is being outflanked and outscored – thoroughly, and by a
lowly engineer working on a few percent of his budget, could relate to that
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton
So, how is he stripping he hydrogen of its electrons?
How do you know he is not adding, rather than stripping :)
I have researched the CIHT and find no IP on it on the web.
I have not seen any either.
BTW what Mills calls hydrino-hydride is
What Mills has done is load H- ions into a nickel lattice as a startup
activity. A shock starts the heat production chain reaction when the nickel
lattice is perturbed and kinetic energy is added. This shock compresses the
H- into nuclear reformation.
What Rossi has done is load H- ions into
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton
So, how is he stripping he hydrogen of its electrons?
How do you know he is not adding, rather than stripping :)
Well, most fuel cells strip the electrons and the proton
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
What Mills has done is load H- ions into a nickel lattice as a startup
activity. A shock starts the heat production chain reaction when the nickel
lattice is perturbed and kinetic energy is added. This shock compresses the
H-
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Sun, 15 May 2011 19:24:54 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
I think it is more likely that he is using the spillover catalyst
effect to strip electrons which provide work and recombine when the H+
hydride ions pass through the membrane to be oxidized.
Now maybe the free
17 matches
Mail list logo
