Re: [Vo]:13 things that do not make sense - space - 19 March 2005 - New Scientist

2013-03-05 Thread Terry Blanton
The key give away is that the Pioneer Anomaly has been solved (to most everyone's satisfaction): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pioneer_anomaly

Re: [Vo]:13 things that do not make sense - space - 19 March 2005 - New Scientist

2013-03-05 Thread Alain Sepeda
Anyway that is interesting to look back in the mirror. I've found such test balloon articles from mainstream sources, after 2009 SPAWAR revival, 2005 (something happened in that period... Seen Tsinghua replication of NASA GRC, a few other papers... Dunno what raised such hope). I understand why

Re: [Vo]:13 things that do not make sense - space - 19 March 2005 - New Scientist

2013-03-05 Thread Jed Rothwell
Mark Gibbs wrote: Bugger. Missed that. Good article though. Worth revisiting. So is this one: Daviss, B., /Reasonable Doubt/, in /New Scientist/. 2003. p. 36. This is about Szpak, Pam Boss, and Mel Miles. Among other things it describes how they demoted Mel from being a Distinguished

[Vo]:13 things that do not make sense - space - 19 March 2005 - New Scientist

2013-03-04 Thread Mark Gibbs
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg18524911.600-13-things-that-do-not-make-sense.html?full=true And #13 is ... [m] 13 Cold fusion AFTER 16 years, it's back. In fact, cold fusion never really went away. Over a 10-year period from 1989, US navy labs ran more than 200 experiments to

Re: [Vo]:13 things that do not make sense - space - 19 March 2005 - New Scientist

2013-03-04 Thread Jed Rothwell
Please note, that's from 2005. - Jed

Re: [Vo]:13 things that do not make sense - space - 19 March 2005 - New Scientist

2013-03-04 Thread Mark Gibbs
Bugger. Missed that. I assumed that they'd link from a current article [1] to a current article, not to history and now I find that that original article, which was linked to a current article wasn't any such thing ... it was also from 2005! I am now very suspicious of New Scientist but welcome